 | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Dave Johann
|
| | | (...) opinion-we will wait until the current line of production stops selling. TLC seems to be after the almighty buck with the SW line, and will continue to give us items that aren't needed (a-wing) rather than items that are (stormtroopers). (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) But remember that the A & B wings featured heavily in the pc computer games (the flight ones anyway) and that kids who play the games will know what an A wing is and will go to mommy in the lego istle and say "Can I have this spaceship out of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Andrew Tyrone
|
| | | | | (...) Woah, woah, wait a minute. The Rebel fleet is not useless! >=O Although I do agree that the Storm Trooper should be available first. Anyways, if they are going to expand the line of Episode 4-6, they'll have to generate more bad guy ships and (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Kevin Knoot
|
| | | | | | | (...) give (...) (stormtroopers). (...) attack (...) haven't (...) Ummm, yeah, the Sandcrawler & Jabba's Sail Barge. (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) TLC (...) How about a Tie Fighter? Jude The Q is silent (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Aaron West
|
| | | | | | | | (...) to (...) Is it wrong to wish for a Rebel Transport? Or Ewok Village, Glider and Catapult complete with little ol' Ewoks? Sectional playsets of the Death Star, Rebel Base and Dagobah? How about a droid service pack with everything to make a (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Bryan Hodges
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'd like to see a whole bunch of modular playsets... everything from the Death Star to Cloud City to Mos Eisley etc... I think the modular idea is a great one which Lego needs to explore. They could make four or five different sets, some big (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | (...) Imperial Shuttle T-16 Skyhopper(ok, it was in the background but it was there) -Chris (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Steve Burge
|
| | | | | | (...) Ewok Village (TLG Can probably milk a few sets out of this one) Ewok Trap (Spring loaded net to capture Wookies!) Imperial Bunker (From ROTJ) Hordes of Death Star Playsets (Make 'em Modular!) Swoop (From ANH:SE) Tusken Raiders and Banthas (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | How about a scaled-down Tantive IV? I realize that building it true minifig-scale would be prohibitive, but they could make it big enough to cram two minifigs in the cockpit and maybe one in a gun turret. Throw in a small escape pod, use the X-Wing (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) And, few soldiers to man the base (one can only buy so many Snowspeeders)...I hope that TLC puts out some Rebel soldier minifig sets - a Hoth soldiers pack & an Endor soldiers pack. (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | (...) Snowspeeders)...I (...) soldiers pack & (...) Don't forget the venerable Rebel Fleet Trooper. Darth's gotta have someone to lift up off the floor. ~Mark (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | (...) Great idea! Those helmets would rock! (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —Bryan Hodges
|
| | | | I actually love the SnowSpeeder set... I think it's a good source for parts (especially those big wings and the slopes... ) Granted, I only own two of them, but I plan on buying several more... (...) & (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this: —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) In by book, it's the best SW set...but, it's not an economical way to build a Hoth army. (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
