Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:18:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1797 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Kingsley writes:
[...]
> In general this years sets are almost as good as last years but there isn't a
> big hype behind it so the sales are probably slow there too except maybe for
> Slave I which contains Boba Fett who has become a Star Wars Folk antihero.
An anecdote to back this up: while browsing at Target yesterday for deals, I
checked out teh SW section. Pretty much all the sets were stocked at theast 4
boxes deep except the Slave I, which was totally cleaned out. I've yet to see
one on the shelves...
- Mike
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
| (...) I have to agree with Christian on this one. Although I have no facts to justify it I think the Classics sets probably sold extremely well and that is why LEGO had such a hard time keeping up. I would not be supprised if the EP1 stuff did not (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
