Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 22:05:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1689 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.starwars, Rose Regner writes:
> In Idaho the new sets (2000) are disappearing off the shelves rather
> quickly. I think most of the sets
> look great this year, except for poor Jar Jar and his Buddy.
The 2000 sets are rocketing off of the shelves in Portland, too.
> I think most of the sets look great this year, except for poor Jar Jar and
> his Buddy.
See, now this is one of the only Episode I sets that I _do_ want a lot of; I
am planning an MOC that uses several dozen of the 8x8 radar dishes. Though I
may have to fill my futbol stadium with Gungans...
-Cheese
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
| Eric Kingsley wrote in message ... (...) but I (...) but (...) of (...) Parents were annoyed with Jar Jar also. My three year old doesn't even like him. (...) a (...) for (...) I thought the new movie was rather disappointing. I believe one reason (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
21 Messages in This Thread: ![Star Wars a loss for Lego? -John Green (1-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (1-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -James Wilson (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Franklin W. Cain (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Lindsay Frederick Braun (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Christian Gemuenden (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Eric Kingsley (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Rose Regner (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Steve Bliss (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Nick Goetz (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Matthew Wilkins (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Mike Clemens (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Gene C. Weissinger (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Charles Spindell (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Arnold Staniczek (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Gene C. Weissinger (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? -Mark Sandlin (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|