Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:52:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3530 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Arnold Staniczek writes:
> > I mean, the
> > playability is quite poor when there are no Stormtroopers to fight, for
> > heaven's sake.
>
> Does Lego think all those a-, b-, x- and y-wings should fight against Darth
> Vader's Tie only?? This is such a poor job, unbelievably! Give us regular
> tie fighters, interceptors, tie bombers, shuttles, all equipped with pilots,
> and storm troopers.... where the hell are they?
> Standing on the dark side is no fun when it comes to Lego.......
>
> Arnold
Yeah, no kidding. Especially when you have to pay $50-$60 to get the set
with DV's TIE.
I think it would be great if they released a set where you could build
either a TIE or TIE Interceptor. But I suppose it'd keep profits up if they
were separate
sets.
~Mark (Why isn't there a stormtrooper minifig pack for brick's sake) Sandlin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
| (...) Does Lego think all those a-, b-, x- and y-wings should fight against Darth Vader's Tie only?? This is such a poor job, unbelievably! Give us regular tie fighters, interceptors, tie bombers, shuttles, all equipped with pilots, and storm (...) (27 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
