Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:34:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2112 times
|
| |
|
|
> I mean, the
> playability is quite poor when there are no Stormtroopers to fight, for
> heaven's sake.
Does Lego think all those a-, b-, x- and y-wings should fight against Darth
Vader's Tie only?? This is such a poor job, unbelievably! Give us regular
tie fighters, interceptors, tie bombers, shuttles, all equipped with pilots,
and storm troopers.... where the hell are they?
Standing on the dark side is no fun when it comes to Lego.......
Arnold
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
| (...) Yeah, no kidding. Especially when you have to pay $50-$60 to get the set with DV's TIE. I think it would be great if they released a set where you could build either a TIE or TIE Interceptor. But I suppose it'd keep profits up if they were (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego?
|
| (...) That is why I have absolutely no idea why TLG is only releasing around 8-10 sets every year. I have a ton of money to spend, but I can only buy so many Naboo Fighters and X-Wings. If TLG put out more sets, including mini-fig packs and play (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
