Subject:
|
Re: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 22:29:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
713 times
|
| |
|
|
oh but jar-jar is? :o)
In lugnet.starwars, Kya Morden writes:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:40:31 GMT, "Ben Gatrelle"
> <ben.gatrelle@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kya Morden
> > >
> > > You mean I'll have to buy 10 more sets just to return my Classic Star
> > > Wars subtheme back to "Complete" status? (Yes, I view the Classic
> > > sets as a different subtheme from the Ep1/Prequels sets.)
> >
> > I agree. after all EP1 has a different logo, and no duplicated minifigs.
> > Isn't that the distinction, after all?
>
> Exactly ^_^
>
> > Ben Gatrelle
> > PS don't look at the Adventurers' logo(s), and don't start the "is R2-D2 a
> > minifig" discussion back up again! :-P
>
> Adventurers have logos? (While I have a few adventurers sets, I only
> have them for the pieces, plan to make a museum one of these days.)
> As for R2, it's not human. ^_^
>
> Kya
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO"
|
| (...) Exactly ^_^ (...) Adventurers have logos? (While I have a few adventurers sets, I only have them for the pieces, plan to make a museum one of these days.) As for R2, it's not human. ^_^ Kya (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
