Subject:
|
Re: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 05:01:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
371 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:40:31 GMT, "Ben Gatrelle"
<ben.gatrelle@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kya Morden
> >
> > You mean I'll have to buy 10 more sets just to return my Classic Star
> > Wars subtheme back to "Complete" status? (Yes, I view the Classic
> > sets as a different subtheme from the Ep1/Prequels sets.)
>
> I agree. after all EP1 has a different logo, and no duplicated minifigs.
> Isn't that the distinction, after all?
Exactly ^_^
> Ben Gatrelle
> PS don't look at the Adventurers' logo(s), and don't start the "is R2-D2 a
> minifig" discussion back up again! :-P
Adventurers have logos? (While I have a few adventurers sets, I only
have them for the pieces, plan to make a museum one of these days.)
As for R2, it's not human. ^_^
Kya
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO"
|
| (...) I agree. after all EP1 has a different logo, and no duplicated minifigs. Isn't that the distinction, after all? Ben Gatrelle PS don't look at the Adventurers' logo(s), and don't start the "is R2-D2 a minifig" discussion back up again! :-P (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
