Subject:
|
RE: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 21:09:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
636 times
|
| |
|
|
I only have 5 of the cans(so far :), but what if you arrange
them in
numerical order. ie. I have cans 10 & 11 and if you have them
in
order they say "future may".
I don't know what any of the other cans say but I would guess
maybe "what the future may bring" or something like that.
Ryan
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 6/21/99, at 2:41 PM, Mark Benz wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: news-gateway@lugnet.com
> > [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
> > Of Steve Bliss
> > Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 10:59 AM
> > To: lugnet.starwars@lugnet.com
> > Subject: Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
>
> SNIP
> >
> > What we've got so far:
> >
> > Word Character Product
> > --------- ---------- -------
> > Destroyed Darth Maul Mt. Dew
> > Future Jar Jar Mt. Dew
> > Menace Valorum
> > The C-3P0
> > But Amidala Pepsi
> > New Anakin
> > Lurks Sebulba Pepsi
> > May Mace Windu Mt. Dew
> > Nearby Padme Naberrie Diet Pepsi
> >
> > Guessed message (assumed words in <>):
> >
> > <Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the Phantom Menace • still lurks
> > nearby.
> >
> > Steve
>
> I don't think so,
> you forgot the words "New" and "future". And Phantom is not on • your list.
> This gives, something like:
>
> <Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the New Future Menace • lurks nearby.
>
> Seems more likely, though new and future are a bit redundant.
> Mark
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
| (...) Hmmm, good idea. Wouldn't that just be too obvious? :-/ I'll post another message (closer to the root in the thread hierarchy, which will put it down at the bottom of the thread-view) with the info I've got. Steve (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
| (...) SNIP (...) I don't think so, you forgot the words "New" and "future". And Phantom is not on your list. This gives, something like: <Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the New Future Menace lurks nearby. Seems more likely, though new and (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
