To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 3090
3089  |  3091
Subject: 
Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 21:07:26 GMT
Viewed: 
719 times
  
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 18:36:07 GMT, "Mark Benz" <mbenz@broadvision.com>
wrote:

What we've got so far:

Word       Character      Product
---------  ----------     -------
Destroyed  Darth Maul     Mt. Dew
Future     Jar Jar        Mt. Dew
Menace     Valorum
The        C-3P0
But        Amidala        Pepsi
New        Anakin
Lurks      Sebulba        Pepsi
May        Mace Windu     Mt. Dew
Nearby     Padme Naberrie Diet Pepsi

Guessed message (assumed words in <>):

<Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the Phantom Menace still lurks
nearby.

Steve

I don't think so,
you forgot the words "New" and "future". And Phantom is not on your list.

This gives, something like:

<Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the New Future Menace lurks nearby.

You are so right.  But there are still 15 unknown words.  It could be:

The <Phantom> Menace may <be> destroyed, but nearby lurks <a> new <some
phrase indicating a danger to the future>.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Jar Jar will probably be back
 
(...) SNIP (...) I don't think so, you forgot the words "New" and "future". And Phantom is not on your list. This gives, something like: <Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the New Future Menace lurks nearby. Seems more likely, though new and (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)

45 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR