Subject:
|
RE: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 18:36:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
720 times
|
| |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news-gateway@lugnet.com
> [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
> Of Steve Bliss
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 10:59 AM
> To: lugnet.starwars@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
SNIP
>
> What we've got so far:
>
> Word Character Product
> --------- ---------- -------
> Destroyed Darth Maul Mt. Dew
> Future Jar Jar Mt. Dew
> Menace Valorum
> The C-3P0
> But Amidala Pepsi
> New Anakin
> Lurks Sebulba Pepsi
> May Mace Windu Mt. Dew
> Nearby Padme Naberrie Diet Pepsi
>
> Guessed message (assumed words in <>):
>
> <Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the Phantom Menace still lurks
> nearby.
>
> Steve
I don't think so,
you forgot the words "New" and "future". And Phantom is not on your list.
This gives, something like:
<Darth> <Maul> may <be> destroyed, but the New Future Menace lurks nearby.
Seems more likely, though new and future are a bit redundant.
Mark
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
| (...) How about "The Menace may be destroyed, but the new Darth Maul lurks in the nearby future." I know it sounds weird, but Maul didn't bleed when Obi-Wan chopped him in half. I'm thinking that he is a droid. Maybe? Greg citrusx__@yahoo.com (URL) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
| (...) You are so right. But there are still 15 unknown words. It could be: The <Phantom> Menace may <be> destroyed, but nearby lurks <a> new <some phrase indicating a danger to the future>. Steve (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | RE: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
| I only have 5 of the cans(so far :), but what if you arrange them in numerical order. ie. I have cans 10 & 11 and if you have them in order they say "future may". I don't know what any of the other cans say but I would guess maybe "what the future (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
| Mookie wrote in message <3767C935.1A1C857C@e...pc.com>... On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:53:17 GMT, "D Garcia" <boneboney@aol.com> wrote: On 6/21/99, at 11:46 AM, blisses@worldnet.att.net wrote: On 6/21/99, "Scott R Dennett" <dennett@agate.net> wrote: What (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
