Subject:
|
Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:37:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
348 times
|
| |
|
|
Wow. I didn't realize the ewoks were smaller. They look the same size as
the rest of em. Veddy cool. I'm not into the potter stuff but of course I
had to get em all. Fluffy is quite nifty. Its frustrating to see info
about sets float around but not able to pull it up at the official site.
Anyone hear if they're gonna make a sandcrawler or deathstar?
Otherwise
> I think the new pieces made for Star Wars and the completed sets are more
> accurate to the movie than a lot of the Harry Potter sets. SW was made for
> adults mostly, HP for kids.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
| No Sandcrawler or Deathstar - looks like the major additions to the Star Wars line will be the top end (price wise) Rebel Blockade Runner, with mostly 'mini(figs)' sets added. (...) same size as (...) course I (...) sets are more (...) was made for (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
| (...) I know. Yes the Ewoks and the goblins from Gringott's bank are described as mini-minifigs. And Hagrid (the big brown guy) is significantly larger than a human or Chewbacca. Chewie was a head or two taller than Han right? Hagid is 9 1/2 or 10 (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
