Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on the (pre EpII) 2002 range
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:31:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
474 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Steve Bliss writes:
> > In lugnet.starwars, A. Mark Wilburn writes:
> >
> > > ... too bad Harry Potter didn't force their
> > > hand at all, with no ethnic diversity).
> >
> > Actually, Harry Potter does have (some) ethnic diversity. Just not in the
> > major characters. If everyone in the movie is white, there's a problem.
> >
> > But I doubt we'll see any minifigs of the non-white characters, unless they
> > release a "Gryffindor Quidditch Team" set, or something. Even then, they'll
> > probably stick with yellow minifigs.
>
> I am quite confused. Why is it that most people think it is okay for 'white'
> people to be made yellow but not 'black' people? I personally belive either
> everyone should be proper flesh tones or everyone should be yellow. Why is it
> okay for a double standard?
I dunno. I'm with you, actually. And I lean heavily toward the 'everyone
should be yellow' end of things.
But I think some people would raise a fuss if a 'black' character was
released as a yellow minifig, because they don't see things the way we do.
So TLC avoids the issue by not releasing minifigs for 'black' characters.
:(
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thoughts on the (pre EpII) 2002 range
|
| (...) I am quite confused. Why is it that most people think it is okay for 'white' people to be made yellow but not 'black' people? I personally belive either everyone should be proper flesh tones or everyone should be yellow. Why is it okay for a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
