Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on the (pre EpII) 2002 range
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 05:17:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
577 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> I am quite confused. Why is it that most people think it is okay for 'white'
> people to be made yellow but not 'black' people? I personally belive either
> everyone should be proper flesh tones or everyone should be yellow. Why is it
> okay for a double standard?
I agree.
But, take for example…
The Simpson’s
White people are Yellow.
Black people are black.
I guess yellow is just taken as an extension of white.
A brighter more vivid color for children to respond to.
Perhaps white peoples color (Pink, peach, whatever.) is far
to dull/lackluster?
-R
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thoughts on the (pre EpII) 2002 range
|
| According to Lego Mania Magazine, Dec 2001 issue: "Why are LEGO mini-figures yellow?" "Okay, the truth is that back in 1972 the LEGO Company asked kids what color they thought mini-figures should be and they said yellow." (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thoughts on the (pre EpII) 2002 range
|
| (...) I am quite confused. Why is it that most people think it is okay for 'white' people to be made yellow but not 'black' people? I personally belive either everyone should be proper flesh tones or everyone should be yellow. Why is it okay for a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
