 | | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) Jaba The Hutt of the first film, (the original one, not the retouched, effect rich newer editions) was also a humanoid. See the reference multimedia CD title from Lucas Arts, "Behind the Magic" for an interview with Lucas, about how they (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) That's fine, and may very well be consistent with what was on the screen, but if this is the case then there should have been some indication that this is what was happening. As it stands, the ships just disappear without a comment from (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) Sigh. My point is that, if the search for the MF were of paramount importance, Vader could have kept his ship in the field and sent a less-than-clear transmission; after all, the Emperor was able to contact Vader's ship, so some communication (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) Trade federation was obeying to the rule of Darth Sidious, which is apparently senator Palpatine. As long as the election of Palpatine as the supreme counselor is greatly related to the actions of Queen in Croscunt is concerned, I'm not sure (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) I clearly remember that this script continued like "..for a clear transmission". So I can't see any character point here. (...) I didn't irritated with this two headed thing, too. And I don't feel myself as silly for that, although I'm (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
I never read any books from any of the two authors you are mentioning here, but here is a good reading, from one of the most "trusty" (IMHO of course) SW reference sites around the net: (URL) "Post ROTJ Apocrypha" Actually all of the site is full (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) But remember that the A & B wings featured heavily in the pc computer games (the flight ones anyway) and that kids who play the games will know what an A wing is and will go to mommy in the lego istle and say "Can I have this spaceship out of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) opinion-we will wait until the current line of production stops selling. TLC seems to be after the almighty buck with the SW line, and will continue to give us items that aren't needed (a-wing) rather than items that are (stormtroopers). (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) there (...) socket. HEHEH (Here's The Full Version) "Its not Wise to upset a Minifig Wookie" "But Sir no one seems to worry about upsetting a Minifig Droid," "Thats Because a MiniFig Droid Won't pull your Arms out of their Sockets because they (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) Yeah, but it takes an awful lot of force to yank an arm out of a minifig's socket. ;) best LFB (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
