To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *7288 (-20)
  Re: Pics of Millennium Falcon
 
(...) Selçuk (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
My beefs aren't with scale. I realize that TLG couldn't make this thing big enough, because it would just cost too much. I stand by my comments, however, on the matters of: - color... once again, light blue?!?! why not more dark gray? [Cost to fix (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
I'd buy a UCS MF and pay up to $500 as long as it was done RIGHT. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) Feh. I actually like the thing. I liked it in preliminary photos, and I still like it. Granted, I wouldn't consider it even CLOSE to being the end-all be-all of Falcon MOCs, but for parts it's stunning. Even the saucer sections look useful! (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
The only falcon that was 40% too small was the one used in the first film (which incidentally, the set for was in my town :) the ones in the other films were the right size. alot of information about the millenium falcon is here: (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) Hmm... Why would R2D2 have need for an inflatable Leia? If anyone had a reason to have one, that would be R4D5, but he isn't included with the set. Or maybe that isn't the case... Ol' Obi-Wan is probably just doing some of his cross dressing (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) it (...) Death (...) island (...) How do you know it is not an inflatable Leia? "It's not my nose, it's a false one," MPFC: Holy Grail Aaron (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
Hello, I think it is okay for LEGO to make toys that are for kids and enjoyable to the collector crowd. I will give credit to LEGO for the model they have given us on both the toy and collector side. As a toy it satisfies all of the play (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) leia, it would have obi wan instead. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) like I (...) resource for (...) Hey, good idea, except how do you know that the set isn't going *to* the Death Star :) Ah well, you can get (old) Obi-Wan's in a relatively cheap set, so I wouldn't be worrying. And another thing, Obi Wan didn't (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) I hate to tell you this, but obi wan died during the fight on the death star, therefore he isnt on the falcon in this case. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
Well I have said it before and I guess I have to say it again. The external scale of the life-sized falcon used in the movies is 40 percent smaller than the internal sets that were used. TLC's falcon is a near perfect external scale. Of course this (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) And where's Obi-Wan? I could have sworn he was on it. =P -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) Of course there are people here who would buy it. The real question is, are there *enough* people in the world at large to make it worth designing, marketing, soliciting, producing, and shipping? Probably not. Anyone who is disappointed with (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) Umm, yes. A UCS MF would be horrible expensive, but I'm guessing it'd be over 2500-3000 pieces. That's a lot. -Chris (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) i agree it is the only set that i know that has c3po and leia... and i think that lego did the best that they could... would any of you buy an enhanced better bigger more accurate one for more than double the price? -James Walker (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
Its kind of funny I thought it looked bigger in the adds! Did anyone else notice this?? ---...--- (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
Remember, Legos are TOYS, and they are made for KIDS. Don't get me wrong, I wish Lego would target us AFOLs, but they don't, and so we have to take what they give us or create our own models. That is, after all, why we like Legos. I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
Knowing me, I'd probably buy it if I could, but I'd end up dismantling it like I did the Tie/advanced and one of my B-wings. It looks like a better resource for good minifigs and large grey pieces if you ask me. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
Well, by "kid" I meant ages 8-12 as it shows on the box. I'm glad that you have taste, however. :^) ~Mark (...) AFOLS (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR