 | | Re: Ben's LEGO Millennium Falcon back on-line
|
|
(...) I've seen it before, but never commented. It's utterly incredible. Jeff J (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space Ship: AstroFoxx
|
|
(...) Well... I don't think they had to fudge together that excuse. A Parsec (parallax-second) is defined by Earth's motion around the Sun. How would Han know (being from a galaxy long, long ago and far, far away) how we would define a Parsec? ;) (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Fresh X-wing pics....
|
|
(...) Nice - very authentic! Jeff J (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Wow! Check the price of this fig.
|
|
Warning. This is not my auction and I don't think anyone here should bid on it (we are all smarter than that anyway). Tell me if this seems strange to you... (URL) would sell mine if I didn't think this was a bit unethical. FUT LUGNET.MARKET.THEORY (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Legitimate Tusken Raider fear
|
|
(...) An (un)fortunate side effect of the lightsaber is that victims who are merely wounded seem unlikely to die of a grisly infection, what with the cauterization and all. It's a real shame, too, as a full-blown bodyrot can really get your point (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Legitimate Tusken Raider fear
|
|
(...) Yeah, bad directing call on Lucas' part there. The Sand People run *after* we see the shot of Obi-Wan, making the viewer think that it's Obi-Wan that they're running from, when in fact, they're running from what they think is a Kryat Dragon. (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Legitimate Tusken Raider fear
|
|
(...) I don't remember where I read it, probably the novelization, but it was suggested that Obi-Wan was immitating the scream of a Kryat (sp?) dragon which would be something the Sand People normally run from. Obviously looking at him he wasn't a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Legitimate Tusken Raider fear
|
|
As I am preparing myself for the Attack of the Clones DVD to come out, something suddenly occurred to me. Remember back in Episode IV A New Hope (The first Star Wars Movie for you novices out there) when Luke was being beaten and robbed by the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
"Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:H42Gxx.7An@lugnet.com... (...) To me it looks like it is a 2x4 piece, so in one plane it will be flush with a 45deg slope and in the other with an 18deg (new-ish 2x4) slope But, I hope (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Size Comparison Chart (Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5)
|
|
(...) Yes. Exactly this movie. You know... this starship of Ripley.. ;) Rene (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Size Comparison Chart (Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5)
|
|
(...) On the bottom right side of the chart: Sovereign Class (Enterprise-E) Galaxy Class (Enterprise-D) Ambassador Class (Enterprise-C) Excelsior Class (Enterprise-B) Constitution Class (Enterprise-A and Enterprise-nil) (...) Huh? Do you mean the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Size Comparison Chart (Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5)
|
|
(...) Actually I did NOT creat it. This was created a few years ago as a "public domain" comparison chart for use in the 'versus' newsgroups. (alt.startrek.vs.starwars for example) (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Size Comparison Chart (Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5)
|
|
Very nice ! But I'm missing the USS Enterprise starships. And what about this starship from Alien ? Thanks. Rene (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Size Comparison Chart (Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5)
|
|
(...) (URL)It is a rather nice chart for its accuracy and its simplicity. ~That's amazin' Thanks sooooo much for creating it!!! --==Richard==-- James Wilson also created: (URL) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Size Comparison Chart (Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5)
|
|
Given the size and number of tangents the other thread took, I started a new one so all interested persons would get a good 'heads up.' This is a very accurate comparison chart. (At least as far as you can go with fictional source materials.) (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) Yeah, James, I know what you mean! I didn't mean to come across as being so militant about this stuff. Believe it or not, I don't sit and obsess about SW scale and such, or spend lots of time researching it (heck, I've only made it through a (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) I have to admit it, I've been out-geeked. And on a subject I would never have thought of as controversial. Going home now to polish my pocket protector. It's lost some of its luster... James (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) Fair enough, and I enjoy a good sci-fi tale as much as most geeks. I just get a big kick out of it when people start arguing about the size of the "real" prototype from a movie. Especially the ones that are completely CGI! Or cartoons - ever (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
Maybe our clamoring for split slopes finally sunk in? ;-) Now all they need to do is make split versions of all the train slopes, and John Neal's head will explode over all the new 8/10/14/20-wide possibilities ;-) (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Sun ONE (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) That's what I really dislike about SWTC. He pulls some factoid that sounds right, and uses it as though it were fact. I first noticed that on his description of AT-AT stride length, but also on his AT-AT height description, and (IIRC) some of (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
