 | | Re: Set 8011: Jango Fett
|
|
It's on the star wars and lego website... (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Set 8011: Jango Fett
|
|
Does anyone have information on this set: (URL) just noticed it in the Bricklink catalog and was curious. TJ (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How to improve the SW Classic Line
|
|
(...) No official set, prototype or otherwise, that I'm aware of, but there was one built by Lego and included in a large Tatooine diorama that toured with one of the Lego trucks a couple years back. More in the style of the typical Lego official (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: How to improve the SW Classic Line
|
|
"Jeremy Scott" <Copyright42000@home.com> wrote in message news:Gr1FBG.JE3@lugnet.com... (...) <snip> I was thinking about this myself last night after seeing pics of the new EP II models. I'm not sure about all those new curved bricks.... (...) (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: How to improve the SW Classic Line
|
|
Some cool ideas. I have always thought that a minifig scale AT AT was screaming out to be made. (...) Seriously, I wonder if lego would put out a "erotic Leia". They could use the islander babe torso with a pair of yellow legs witha brown (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: How to improve the SW Classic Line
|
|
(...) I like your ideas. But doesn't the license only go on for another three years? We are in the fourth year of the seven year license. Maybe Lego could re-release the sets, but without actually signing a new license, I doubt they could continue (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Dark Side X-wing [alternate universe?]
|
|
I like. Nice use of the support stand from the Tie fighter. Much better way to display than the afterthought of the landing gear of the original set. (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
Forgot to mention, if you look really close at this pic: (URL) can see another bow, upside-down at the bottom, that the top portion sort of slots on to. So that makes 1 stern and 2 bows that make up the engine core, complements of my Black Seas (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
"Jon Palmer" <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in message news:Gr4rL5.98q@lugnet.com... (...) Nice... but what is it? -- Grant Giandonato g.giandonato@home.com Check out my eBay auctions: (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:v0536u4b2n82p3a...4ax.com... (...) Cough cough *bow* cough cough *stern* cough cough. ;-) (URL) The Galactic Shipyard - (URL) My Lego Creations - (URL) Attack of the Bricks - (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
(...) The bow and stern parts are much more "SPUD'y" than the mid-sections. They (bows & sterns) *can* be adapted to to other uses, especially for large-scale constructions. But their unique shape makes it much harder. Ditto for the masts - they (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Dark Side X-wing [alternate universe?]
|
|
My buddy Brian had the interesting idea of making a black X-wing. We just used the x-wing instructions and changed colors as needed. I think the only piece substitution was the 1x3 slopes on the side since I didn't have black angle-bricks. Dark Side (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
(...) SPUD is a little better term, but the "Useless" part is quite a value judgment. As I always whip out, the LEGO theme which probably provides the most exposure outside our tiny circle of friends is absolutely dependent on pieces some folks (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
(...) Pirate Hull = SPUD huh? (URL) (...) -Jason +---...---+ Jason Spears Michlug - (URL) Page - (URL) Store - (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
These pieces are more accurately called "SPUD"s rather than "POOP"s. SPUD==Special Purpose/Useless/Decorative BTW, I catagorize Pirate Hulls and Masts as SPUDs, too. OMFIAMP. -gyug (...) [...] (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | How to improve the SW Classic Line
|
|
My Opinion on and how to improve the Lego Star Wars Classic Line: I have developed a strong opinion on what Lego should do to improve their SW line. If I were at Lego, I would begin to incorporate these ideas after one and one half years of the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Super Battle Droid
|
|
My first guess as to the joints is that they are a variation of the new arm pieces seen in the new Alpha Team sets (URL) and (URL) One of the pictures on Starwars.com ((URL) to have the best view. Let the speculation continue... -Joel (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
in article Gqzu44.GDt@lugnet.com, Mr L F Braun at braunli1@pilot.msu.edu wrote on 2/4/02 12:33 AM: (...) Hmm, could be. Maybe it's just shadows or the camera angle, but the parts on the left engine looked decidedly "pointy" to me. Sort of like a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Super Battle Droid
|
|
(...) Yikes! I have never been interested in the Technic figures (excepting the destroyer droid) but this does look more fearsome than the standard battle droid. My main question is: Does anyone know anything about, or can anyone speculate from the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Super Battle Droid
|
|
(URL) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
