Subject:
|
Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:50:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.starwars, Jason Spears wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, Paul Gyugyi writes:
> > These pieces are more accurately called "SPUD"s rather than "POOP"s.
> > SPUD==Special Purpose/Useless/Decorative
> > BTW, I catagorize Pirate Hulls and Masts as SPUDs, too. OMFIAMP.
> > -gyug
>
> Pirate Hull = SPUD huh?
>
> http://www.oklahoma.net/~jpalmer/lego/nori.html
:)
The bow and stern parts are much more "SPUD'y" than the mid-sections.
They (bows & sterns) *can* be adapted to to other uses, especially for
large-scale constructions. But their unique shape makes it much harder.
Ditto for the masts - they don't have many connection points, it's hard
to use them for anything other than long, pointy, poles.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
| "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:v0536u4b2n82p3a...4ax.com... (...) Cough cough *bow* cough cough *stern* cough cough. ;-) (URL) The Galactic Shipyard - (URL) My Lego Creations - (URL) Attack of the Bricks - (URL) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread: ![Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Shaun Sullivan (31-Jan-02 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Lindsay Frederick Braun (31-Jan-02 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Frank Filz (3-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -John Kornhaus (4-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Lindsay Frederick Braun (4-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -John Kornhaus (4-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Paul Gyugyi (6-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Jason Spears (6-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Frank Filz (6-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Jon Palmer (6-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Jon Palmer (6-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Paul Gyugyi (8-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Grant Giandonato (6-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Paul Gyugyi (8-Feb-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -A. Mark Wilburn (31-Jan-02 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ... -Jonathan Lill (31-Jan-02 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|