Subject:
|
Re: No new space sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 16:28:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1606 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Matthew Miller writes:
> Nephilim <jthompson@esker.com> wrote:
> > Not trying to be overly argumentative - I could hazard a guess that
> > LEGO might be prohibited from selling "futuristic space ships" and
> > that current NASA-esque sets wouldn't fall under that theme. But
> > that's hazarding a guess. Wish I knew the source of this licensing
> > rumor.
>
> I don't buy it. I think it far more likely that Lego has _decided_ that Star
> Wars is filling the role of a space theme.
Until I understand where the licensing-prevents-LEGO-from-selling-
non-star-wars-spaceships came from, that is my theory as well.
--
jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: No new space sets?
|
| (...) I don't buy it. I think it far more likely that Lego has _decided_ that Star Wars is filling the role of a space theme. (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
