Subject:
|
Re: No new space sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 13:20:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2900 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> > The first person who said this, remind us why. LEGO didn't seem
> > to have a problem introducing Insectoid sets the same year as the
> > Star Wars sets, or the new town space-shuttle-esque line. And
> > Rock Raiders looks pretty "spacy." That's two (or three lines) of
> > Space Toys being sold in the Big Year for Episode One sets.
>
> Insectoids was running out the 2 year period.
Yup - I realized that seconds after I posted it, but didn't have time
to go and cancel and edit my message. Sorry!
> Spaceoprt is not space. Rock
> raiders is not space. The restriction sepcially restricts "spaceships" such
> as those found in the true space themes.
What restriction? Where did we hear about this? Why were the Spaceport
spaceships not covered?
--
jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: No new space sets?
|
| (...) They are not spaceships. Does nasa call the space shuttle a spaceship? I think not. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: No new space sets?
|
| (...) Insectoids was running out the 2 year period. Spaceoprt is not space. Rock raiders is not space. The restriction sepcially restricts "spaceships" such as those found in the true space themes. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
