Subject:
|
Re: No new space sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 16:00:18 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.NOSPAMorg
|
Viewed:
|
1038 times
|
| |
|
|
Nephilim <jthompson@esker.com> wrote:
> Not trying to be overly argumentative - I could hazard a guess that
> LEGO might be prohibited from selling "futuristic space ships" and
> that current NASA-esque sets wouldn't fall under that theme. But
> that's hazarding a guess. Wish I knew the source of this licensing
> rumor.
I don't buy it. I think it far more likely that Lego has _decided_ that Star
Wars is filling the role of a space theme.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: No new space sets?
|
| (...) Until I understand where the licensing-prevents-L...m-selling- non-star-wars-spaceships came from, that is my theory as well. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily" (24 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: No new space sets?
|
| (...) So, since Paramount calls THEIR spaceships "starships" rather than "spaceships" it would be OK for LEGO to license the Star Trek universe and sell models of the Enterprise? Space shuttles fly thru space. I'd call them spaceships, even if NASA (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
