Subject:
|
Re: .Space MOC/idea repository concept for discussion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:28:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote:
| |
Am I the only one who sees the inherent flaw in this idea? If the links
aren’t permanently tied to the images through LUGNET, what makes you think
they’ll be any better on another website?
|
I agree. What I think we need is a dedicated computer, with immense storage
capability. Most websites have limits of the amount of MBs you take up, and if
you’ve ever looked at how many Brickshelf galleries are LEGO space, you’d know
how quickly we’d run out of space on any conventional web-hosting acocunt.
A dedicated Web server would also have many other benefits, including no pop-ups
(unless you put them there) a domain name, easy-to-access file organization and
sorting, and etc. To overcome the problem of copyright violation, we could
simply ask permission from the owners of the pictures, and if they wanted the
pictures removed (which would likely be an infrequent occurance) they could
simply email the curators/managers of the site.
Curt Tigges
Supreme Commander of Starforce
www.commandercurt.net/UnitedLFWEB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: .Space MOC/idea repository concept for discussion
|
| (...) Am I the only one who sees the inherent flaw in this idea? If the links aren't permanently tied to the images through LUGNET, what makes you think they'll be any better on another website? The only way to guarantee that they are permanently (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
