Subject:
|
Re: Rule No. 1 (was CT-150 Industrial Transport Shuttle)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:29:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
655 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Tom Sciortino wrote:
| |
| |
One thing I’ve noticed in all these years in .space, is that there’s an
overwhelming tendency for the best MOCs to have the fewest open areas of
exposed studs, be they covered with greeblies, tiles, slopes, thinwalls or
any sort of contouring/texturing really. Hmm, how’s that for Rule No.1 of the
Space Builder’s Manual? “Where there are studs, thou shalt put stuff
instead”.
|
That’s an interesting point and I’m curious how many agree with that. It
does seem true that a lot of the more interesting models these days do seem
to have fewer studs showing, but I wonder if it’s become a rule? I still
think a lot of classic space still looks cool, even though there are studs
all over the place.
Anyone care to prove that this rule, like all, was made to be broken? ;)
|
I’d definitely like to see that. Keep in mind, though, that I wasn’t saying it
wouldn’t look cool with big areas of studs - I’d want to see an example where
it didn’t seem like an improvement to build anything on those areas.
Cheers,
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Rule No. 1 (was CT-150 Industrial Transport Shuttle)
|
| "Paul Baulch" <paul.baulch@SPAMLESSatari.com> wrote in message news:HGK5I7.1IIA@lugnet.com... (...) exposed (...) sort of (...) That's an interesting point and I'm curious how many agree with that. It does seem true that a lot of the more (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
