To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 25240
25239  |  25241
Subject: 
Re: Rule No. 1 (was CT-150 Industrial Transport Shuttle)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 07:46:35 GMT
Viewed: 
691 times
  
In lugnet.space, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch wrote:
   In lugnet.space, Tom Sciortino wrote:
   Anyone care to prove that this rule, like all, was made to be broken? ;)


I’d definitely like to see that. Keep in mind, though, that I wasn’t saying it wouldn’t look cool with big areas of studs - I’d want to see an example where it didn’t seem like an improvement to build anything on those areas.

I’m surprised you’ve forgotten about these so soon.

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=43910 http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=34422


I hadn’t forgotten about those... I actually think they would have looked cooler with tiles and stuff on the exposed areas... but budgetary limitations aren’t usually something I include in a critique. One has the bricks one can afford, generally.

Cheers,





Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rule No. 1 (was CT-150 Industrial Transport Shuttle)
 
(...) I'm surprised you've forgotten about these so soon. (URL) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)

16 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR