 | | Re: The Chase!
|
|
(...) Cool! (...) I did but after I posted them I realized that the Lgeo renders had a few minor problems and so when I moved the scene to brickshelf I didn't post those. I'm going out of town for about a week now, (I'll still have access to Lugnet (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: sorry, just call me baku.
|
|
Ahhh! I feel better now. I almost didn't ask because I thought maybe you didn't want people to remember, but oh well, curiosity got me. Good luck with the comic, it sounds like fun:) Is there a site with all the info still on it? Send me all the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
|
Hi. Gravity generators per se are not in violation of the laws of physics. However, they are far in advance of any current technology that we have. In order to generate an artificial gravity field, without the use of centrifugal force, we'd have to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: The Chase!
|
|
(...) Done! :-, I'll post an update soon. BTW, in the original message you mention some renderings of the same scene using LGEO parts...do you still have those? Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
My 889, 891, 894, 897, 918 and 920 all show (C)1979 on the instructions. I'm afraid the boxes never made it... However, 367 is (C)1975.... ;-) Duq "Suzanne D. Rich" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:3B3252A5.A405CE...ate.com... (...) started (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
|
(...) Thank you, Bill, for telling me what the name of that technology was in my letter. There is a fatal flaw in your response, however, Bill. You seem to think that it is impossible to conduct this type of technology yet you already answered how (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | sorry, just call me baku.
|
|
(...) Hi, I was really excited about it too, but I am also working on another project that has sort of taken over my free time, I have been working on creating a graphic novel for a few years, and I just finished writing the storyline last month. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) I appreciate that you have shown the box for the proof of their arguement, Suzanne. Jesse Long (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) For the sake of further evidence, I own a classic space LEGO box that says '1978'. it was purchased in the USA (for me as a kid). Differentiating characteristic between 493 in 1978 is the lack of a crater baseplate (uses bricks to build (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Chase!
|
|
Hey that'd be cool by me! : ) -Jon "Ryan Farrington" <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:004f01c0fa75$5d...dly.com... (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
|
(...) The only form of "artificial gravity" that is currently possible is to use a centrifuge structure to simulate gravity. If you've seen the film "2001: A Space Odyssey" you will remember the doughnut-shaped room where the men worked and (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) The sets were made in December of 1978 but were labeled as 1979. This is an occurence that happens much too frquently in merchandising and I think that Lego simply confused people with that approach to their customers. (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: I could use some help, please.....
|
|
(...) I have found a store on BrickBay which sells them but I have to order five dollars of merchandise before they see the light of day in my house. :.( Did you see the letter I posted about the hybrid mecha/space craft design? I always wanted to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) I received the beloved 924 in 1978. I recall it quite vividly; I know that I received it for Christmas, and I know that I had it during Spring of 1979 (I still have it, of course!). Does this help you? Dave! (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) The logo for Blacktron I and the Legend of Zelda series both contain the same logo but The Legend of Zelda also contains the logo in an upward direction and I know this because I used to own the Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past on my Super (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) I believe you, but to play devil's advocate the instructions on Brickshelf show 1979. I seem to remember a debate coming up once before on copyright vs. release date. Can anyone point to a resolution, or am I just smoking crack? (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) Really? I never knew that. Thanks for pointing it out. Do you have a link or proof that this was the case? (...) Oh, I was not aware that you were referring to the minifigs. True, SP1 and black Futuron minifigs both have the same torsos. But (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) Here's a list of sets from 1978 and there are definatly soem CS sets there: (URL) here is a timeline of lego space, which has a little entry under 78: (URL) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: On to other news....
|
|
(...) Sorry, it was started in 1978. (...) Sorry pal, but you're not going to win this. If you insist you are right, I insist that you check the release date on <set:924> (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
