 | | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
Okay, I've stripped most of the greeblies: (URL) this a good place to start redesigning the model? PLMKWYT. -JHK (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
Wow, thanks for the very detailed response, Paul. I might change the story line... -JHK (who's going to go and redesign the Heavy Fighter, or perhaps take it apart and try to build a greeblie-less ship) (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | to greeble or not to greeble
|
|
(...) well, there are basically two 'kinds' of design: 1) greebled, machinery, "dirty" look 2) smooth, sleek, refined, "clean" look #1 shows up in a lot of movies like Aliens, et al where you see lots of greeblies all over everything. #2 shows up in (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Greeblies: Pros and Cons (was: New Space MOCs)
|
|
(...) My designs take in a great deal of various Sci Fi sources. Most space vehicles on TV and movies are typically fairly uncluttered, or at least have large expanses of smooth surfaces. Most likely because it's easier to make models that way. But (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: The Quasar
|
|
OK, well, at the risk of being accused of saying its PrettyGood TM its PrettyGood. meaning, its a lot better than other stuff you've done. you are getting a cool feel for shape and color and hiding stuff in your ship like sandman does sometimes. i (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
On 00:37 01/13/2003 +0000, Paul Hartzog wrote (...) Is there a ship under all those greeblies? :-) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
(...) Well... I would gladly trade an ISD for a plane ticket to a certain place near Arlington, Virginia that happens during the summer and I can't go to because of cost... Thanks for the compliments. (...) Yeah, I didn't have a proper fleebnork (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
(...) well, not that I am an authority on Fleebs, but it seems to grok. reference posts: (URL) Fleebs seem to leach power, and lay eggs in crevices, greebs make a natural habitat for them to nest. cheers! Jk (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Greeblies: Pros and Cons (was: New Space MOCs)
|
|
(...) Thanks for the feedback, guys. I'm gonna go think about the whole engreeblment idea. I guess that it depends on a person's idea of a spaceship. I've always imaganed a spaceship as a clunky bit of machinery that needs large amounts of just (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
(...) Thanks! I like the tanker alot, too. I was on a trip with a small bot-factory like box and the two crow's nest pieces gave me an idea... I like the way it turned out. -JHK (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) Yeah... I just called it a fighter because it was small, and had lots of fightery-stuff like weapons, sensors, etc. I just threw in the room because I love interioirs. I'm not really sure what to call this... Browsing (URL) see (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
All of these are very nice MOCs. The "Heavy Fighter" is very cool. The only fault I can find with it is that there are so many greeblies that the the fighter would be very vulnerable, with so much machinery exposed. But overall, very good job. Curt (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | The Quasar
|
|
Hello all, A new fighter has been put on the ULF website. The link is here: (URL) Quasar is considered by many Starforce Engineers to be the Transaerospace Forces' finest achievement. The Quasar features a cockpit made out of very high-grade (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
whoa? is there some connection between greeblies and fleebnork lodgings? do tell.... -p (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
(...) I had the same thought. While the heavy fighter looks nice, I think it's a little TOO engreebled. There ought to be a few patches where it's smoothish because, as Curt said, if this were a real ship, all those little bits would be very (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
(...) yeah! me too... and I have to give you credit for detailing the bottom. I like the overall shape, although I personally would prefer to see the greeblies a bit more concentrated... otherwise fleebs are gonna be ALL OVER that ship :D cheers! Jk (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
All of these are very nice MOCs. The "Heavy Fighter" is very cool. The only fault I can find with it is that there are so many greeblies that the the fighter would be very vulnerable, with so much machinery exposed. But overall, very good job. Curt (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
Umm, Me too. What paul said. But what is the blue thing to the left of the canopy? (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space MOCs
|
|
Kruer, the heavy fighter is a schizophrenic nightmare and i mean that in a good way. very innaresting. very greebled. here are two ships also overdone: (by paul hanson) one named (synchronicitously) Overkill (URL) the prospector (URL) they are (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Luna Spire Moonbase Super-module
|
|
Wow, look at all the details! A very inspiring design too. Great descriptions as well. I enjoyed seeing the pictures of the Luna Spire. Great job! e (22 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
