 | | Re: WORDLIST
|
|
(...) Long time no see:) Below is source for .S DUMP WORDS and SEE. Usage of the individual words should be basically clear, but I have some remarks nontheless: - Those words were originally embedded in a collection of words that I always load. I (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: WORDLIST
|
|
Ernst! Good to see you're still among us. I'd be happy to post your WORDS and SEE (with appropraite credit) and write up a little tutorial on their usage. You can post them here and also email them to me directly. Cheers, Ralph (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: WORDLIST
|
|
(...) I wrote WORDS and SEE and some other useful stuff for pbforth 1.21. SEE is a bit rough, it doesn't handle IF, LOOP etc. very graciously but just dumps out bytes. If the dictionary structure hasn't changed in 2.0 they should still work. If (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: WORDLIST
|
|
(...) Well, not *very* important, perhaps (no need to hurry), but it'd be useful. I haven't done very much FORTH programming since the 80's, and I even then I wasn't exactly a pro FORTHer. Also, I was used to F-PC (and/or TCOM), and my FORTH (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: WORDLIST
|
|
(...) Ah, I didn't know of that. (...) BTW, I'd like to suggest (to Ralph, not you) that the pbForth scripts included in the release should use .4th or .fth or something a bit more distinctive. They're now .txt, so BricxCC does not recognize them. (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: WORDLIST
|
|
(...) snip A while ago, I started to work on a few words that I find useful,including WORD and SEE. I still have to finish them, but what would help is to know the structure of the dictionary (starting with the execution address obtained by tick (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: WORDLIST
|
|
(...) The pbForth documentation which is included with the latest release of BricxCC indicates which of the ANS FORTH words are supported by pbForth. If you open a forth document (one with an extension which BricxCC recognizes as a forth document) (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: WORDLIST
|
|
Good questions Juanma! If WORDS is very important for you, I can write up a quick tutorial on how to do that. I'm pretty sure all of the CORE or REQUIRED ANS Forth words are supported. I'll need to update my build script to output a list of the (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | WORDLIST
|
|
Is there any way in pbForth to list the currently defined words, à la WORDS? Also, is there any document that list which ANS FORTH words are supported by pbForth (other than reading the source, I mean)? Thanks. (20 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Problem with rcxTcl.exe and the USB IR tower
|
|
(...) I'll check this out on a system that has absolutely no Tcl support, but as you might expect - it works fine here :-) (...) I'm sure John Hansen would appreciate any feedback on BricxCC - even if it'a a problem report. (...) That's the spirit! (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) ;o) ... but why not ? (...) You're right, I should try pbForth, actually I intend to do that for a while but never jumped in. In the late 80's, I was involved in a point of sales terminal project that was programmed with a preemptive (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Q for Ralph
|
|
Why, exactly, does pbForth use a terminal emulator for the PC to talk to the RCX? Although I admit I find it an interesting concept (it's got a certain nostalgic appeal, at least for me), the design seems to encourage leaving the RCX on for extended (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | IR problems
|
|
Hi, I was having some problems in a program I'm writing in PbForth and it seems that it could be related to the way I communicate thru IR. I use the Lego remote control. I joined the following code to demonstrate. I use the word 'getHeader' from (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: NQC's future
|
|
(...) Ha Ha, very funny :-) Seriously, Philippe, why not give pbForth a try? I know that NQC works great on both the Spybots and the RCX, and even Cybermaster. But if you're looking for speed, higher precision, lots of variables and generally more (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: New Version of pbForth with DCC Support Released
|
|
(...) Enough interest? How about this: I think there'd be a HUGE interest! What would it take to convince you? We have no DCC session on tap as of right now, (1) and this would go well in robotics AND trains!!! Please do come! 1 - we were angling (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | New Version of pbForth with DCC Support Released
|
|
All, I've just finished updating the pbForth webiste with information on the latest version of pbForth that supports DCC. Yay! Yes, you can use Mark Riley's excellent train control firmware, but if you want to write code that starts and stops trains (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC release 3.3.7.6
|
|
(...) Thanks! It does work well! My files had a .txt extension. But since I've renamed them, it works beautiful. (...) Very impressive and useful features. (...) Now I get it! (...) You're right (...) I renamed the help files back and it's great (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC release 3.3.7.6
|
|
(...) Unfortunately I haven't documented my pbForth support very well. Perhaps the following explanation will be useful to all BricxCC users who want to try pbForth. BricxCC figures out some things based on the extension of the file open in the (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
|
In lugnet.trains, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> This weekend was exceptionally busy, but I had time to play with the layout. Took my laptop downstairs, set it up with the IR tower, and loaded up Full Throttle. Wow! Pretty nifty piece of (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, FTX)
|
| |
| | RE: Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
|
(...) DOH! Of course. In the fire alarm business, we have a three state voltage out to the sensors. Usually the Vout is 24V and the device can respond when the voltage falls to 5 V. The devices have a power supply that is basically a big cap and a (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
