| |
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, lego-robotics@crynwr.com (alex wetmore) writes:
> > From: "Laurentino Martins" <lmartins@marktest.pt>
>
> > I would be interested in seeing a similar library for pbForth. I'm
> > personally interested in using this language, but haven't had a chance
> > to yet. A library of basic scripts (which might already exist; I haven't
> > looked in a long time) would be a good way to a quick start.
>
> Heck, we could do it for all three -- NQC, pbFORTH, and legOS. Could even
> start a webpage with links back into the news articles to organize them.
>
> --Todd
Since many algorithms apply across languages, what about a single
repository for
all code?
(How about lugnet.robotics.rcx.code?) True, it would increase the
noise-to-signal
ratio for many, but it would Keep It Simple.
Also, I favor follow-ups going directly to the repository news articles,
for all
the benefits seen in the .dat.models Battlestar Galactica example. It would
also
be a good way for people to suggest patches to the originally posted code.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Code Repository
|
| From: "Brian B. Alano" <alano@kiva.net> (...) I personally prefer to see implementations in a real language, but the language itself doesn't matter. It is pretty easy to translate algoritms from Pascal to C (to use a off-topic example), but it can (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
