 | | Re: Can't get Linux NQC to compile/Run
|
|
(...) I'm afraid I don't have a clue how to compile that one. I tried make test.c but, of course, that doesn't work. I also tried [tfm@linux tfm]$ gcc ./test.c ./test.c:1: vector.h: No such file or directory but not much luck there either. Dean -- (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't get Linux NQC to compile/Run
|
|
(...) I tried that first. After letting the RPM installer install NQC i386 I get this message when I try to run it. [tfm@linux tfm]$ nqc nqc: error in loading shared libraries: nqc: undefined symbol: _t24__default_alloc_....free_list It's a standard (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't get Linux NQC to compile/Run
|
|
(...) Dean -- have you tried my prebuilt RPMs? They should run on Mandrake with no problem. I know that doesn't solve the actual build issue (Dave's suggestion sounds good) but it should get you a working NQC. (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't get Linux NQC to compile/Run
|
|
(...) Sounds like part of the g++ library is missing....or perhaps an incompatability between the installed library and the g++ header files. I'm not quite sure how to unmangle that name, but my first guess would be the default allocator used in (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: newbie questions...
|
|
(...) yes (...) That's pretty tough to implement. Code in the tasks is easy...the task number is a constant. Same for subs that are only called from one task. Inline functions are also easy...provided they are called from one of the above. The (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Can't get Linux NQC to compile/Run
|
|
I'm sort of new to Linux (mandrake 7.1) and I've been trying to get NQC to work but keep getting odd errors. "./nqc: error in loading shared libraries: ./nqc: undefined symbol: _t24__default_alloc_...free_list" comes up when I try to run the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating sight for RIS/No Vision Command
|
|
Tough, I think that in order to do this you would need to do some very complicated electronics and programming of a computer that could all be carried on the rcx and use little power. This would probably involve lots of expensive stuff. Although (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: newbie questions...
|
|
(...) Ok, so the 'if ( ActiveEvents(10) & EVENT_MASK(0) )' is the correct syntax to check if event 0 was triggered ? (...) Or a function that returns the current task number ? Thanks for your advices and keep up the good work ! Stelian. (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: newbie questions...
|
|
(...) Both versions should work ok. Personally I prefer something like the following code because its less code overall and the "modality" of the program is apparent from the listing. But its really a matter of personal style. #define TOUCH SENSOR_1 (...) (24 years ago, 9-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Creating sight for RIS/No Vision Command
|
|
Hello Does anybody have any experience in adapting a small color video camera so that it will either send messages to the RCX via the IR port or connect to the RCX's sensor inputs ? I realize that at the very least I am going to have to create some (...) (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts & Issues w/ Vision Command
|
|
(...) It MUST be used with a PC. The camera has no special programs or anything like that. It's the PC that is the link between the Camera and the RCX... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 9-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Thoughts & Issues w/ Vision Command
|
|
Hello Does the Vision Command camera send messages to the RCX via the IR port ? I would assume this would be the case but I just wanted to make sure. Also, does Vision Command come pre-configured with a default program or do you have to configure it (...) (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | newbie questions...
|
|
Hi everybody, I recently acquired a RIS 1.5 box and started playing with nqc (great program btw)... Still, I have some questions... Let's take a simple example: I have 1 touch sensor and I want to do a SOUND_UP when the touch is pressed and a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NQC with iBook
|
|
(...) No extra cables needed. The PDA adapter's DB9 is a configured as a standard serial port. (...) Yep. Under MacOS, this is all you do. Lon (24 years ago, 28-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NQC with iBook
|
|
I use the Keyspan TWIN adapter (USB to serial port) along with a simple mac-to-pc style serial adapter (I think it came with a Pilot 1000 many years ago). The TWIN adapter is a bit pricey, but I bought it because it also works with externally synced (...) (24 years ago, 28-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NQC with iBook
|
|
Okay, but don't I have to buy a second adapter so that the IR cable can fit in the Keyspan PDA adapter? Or like cut up and change positions of the IR-cable inputs? Or do I just have to buy an adapter, connect it, connect the IR tower, download NQC (...) (24 years ago, 28-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NQC with iBook
|
|
I have had no difficulty using NQC on iMacs with a Keyspan PDA adapter (USB to DB9). The adapters run about $39US. The adapter comes with the necessary drivers that allow NQC to see it. Have fun! (...) (24 years ago, 27-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Using NQC with iBook
|
|
I have an iBook. I know about NQC and decided to give it a try. I thought "hey, it works for mac! Great! I can install it on my iBook, run it, and then I can program my robots on my iBook! Piece of cake!" ...not. The iBook only has a USB port, no (...) (24 years ago, 27-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 r1 released
|
|
Dave, I just wanted to say a BIG THANKS for all your hard work and continued efforts with NQC. Some people debate whether they should stick with NQC or move to Lego's new format. After reading the updated Programmer's guide I know which one I'm (...) (24 years ago, 26-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 r1 released
|
|
Ok. Linux builds (i386 and src RPMs, tar.gz) now at (URL). I still need to work on the man page and docs. I'm probably going to start using one of the compile farms to make versions for other architectures and packaging systems. After I do the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
