Subject:
|
Re: newbie questions...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 08:28:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1942 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 05:30:24 GMT,
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> The above looks good, but I haven't tried it so there could be a subtle
> problem. Using ActiveEvents() is pretty awkward at present because you
> need to know the task number of the running task (task main is 0). With
> the latest firmware (firm0328.lgo) you can use ActiveEvents(10) to
> always get active events for the current task.
Ok, so the 'if ( ActiveEvents(10) & EVENT_MASK(0) )' is the
correct syntax to check if event 0 was triggered ?
> I'll probably add more
> sophisticated catch code to NQC in the future that takes advantage of
> ActiveEvents(10).
Or a function that returns the current task number ?
Thanks for your advices and keep up the good work !
Stelian.
--
Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@alcove.fr>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: newbie questions...
|
| (...) yes (...) That's pretty tough to implement. Code in the tasks is easy...the task number is a constant. Same for subs that are only called from one task. Inline functions are also easy...provided they are called from one of the above. The (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: newbie questions...
|
| (...) Both versions should work ok. Personally I prefer something like the following code because its less code overall and the "modality" of the program is apparent from the listing. But its really a matter of personal style. #define TOUCH SENSOR_1 (...) (24 years ago, 9-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
