 | | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
|
(...) It wouldn't, though. First it gets the maximum of the given value or RANGE_SIZE. That is done to prevent a similar overflow at the low end, even though, with current values, that won't happen. Then, that value is compared against the safe (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Linux Newbie
|
|
Linux is a full blown Operating System, available with full source code. A good place to start is (URL) legOS is built using the same tools that are used to build Linux (GNU compiler and tools, etc.), I don't believe that you need to use Linux to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
|
Lou, thank you for your reply. (...) This should work. (...) This seems wrong to me because sets all the STATE_n_VALUE to k-RANGE_SIZE. For now I modified ds_rotation_handler() in this way (two occurrences): // if ( IN_RANGE ( STATE_0_VALUE ) ) { // (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Experimenting with Visual Basic - Learning Edition
|
|
Hello: Just thought that I would post a comment regarding Visual Basic and RCX programming. I am new to using Visual Basic as a programming language. But I decided since the Lego Mindstorms System can be controlled by Visual Basic, I would look into (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) Indeed. I just figured that since the infrastructure would already be there for networking, it would be elegant to use the same for IPC. As you said, they don't actually need to be integrated. Then, there is your point about compiling in LNP (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: LNP Repost
|
|
Very true, but lets try hard not to add any more bytes to the header. The smaller the better since the packets are probably pretty small. -Jake -----Original Message----- From: Ben Laurie [mailto:ben@algroup.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, April 17, 1999 (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: LNP Repost
|
|
Those are some really good points, but I am still concerned about the complexity and overhead of implementing IPC on the lego. Since resources are so limited it might just be easier to use shared memory and semaphores to communicate. On the other (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Linux Newbie
|
|
Here is a silly question, but you guys are the right ones to answer it... compliment I think :) I need to find a "What the hell is Linux" webpage. I _think_ it is a OS that is user developed, and is common on UNIX systems. I run windows 98 and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) For IPC, each (unshared) connection would take 2 ports (src/dest), so 4 bits at least lets us have 7 IPCs (assuming port 0 is reserved as it is in Berkeley sockets, 8 if it is not). I could certainly see having need of more than 3 IPC (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensor bug found (maybe!)
|
|
(...) You've got a point here. What if we hardwire STATE_0_VALUE to the following? #define STATE_0_VALUE (ds_unscale(1023U)-RANGE_SIZE) Or, for a more general approach: #define MIN(a,b) (a<b?a:b) #define MAX(a,b) (a>b?a:b) #define STATE_VALUE(k) ( \ (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Rotation sensor bug found (maybe!)
|
|
I think I might have found a bug in the ds_rotation_handler (direct-sensor.c). The problem arises when the STATE_0_VALUE is checked using the IN_RANGE macro. As STATE_0_VALUE is 1023U<<6, which is about the max value for an unsigned, adding to it (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) Actually, no. On attempt 16, you reserve some more bits further down for the new version number :-) Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I'd prefer 11111b for broadcast, in keeping with TCP/IP. Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
I personally can't see needing more than about 7 tasks listening at one time anyway. Keep in mind that the resources on the lego are very very small. As far as reserving an address for IPC that would be fine. We could reserve 00000b for IPC and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I can see this. but it is starting to feel a little cramped on the ports, though. What functionality is port 0 reserved for? Actually, I was thinking of reserving a host address (such as 0x0) for IPC. I'd probably want to have more than 3 (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Rotation sensor help (some progress)
|
|
Again about my problems with legOS and the rotation sensor. First of all I checked the four values returned by both my two rotation sensor. They are different from the ones inside direct-sensor.c but anyway inside the specified range legOS: (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
I figured that out... Thanks... I am subscribed via email now! Much nicer... I am just too lazy to remeber to go check news groups. -Jake (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
Jacob S. Barrett <jsbarrett@acm.org> wrote in message news:3716681C.D5C8C6...acm.org... (...) You can subscribe to this newsgroup as a mailing list. I would prefer to see it on this group (or less thing to subscribe to) or to have lugnet make a new (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP Repost
|
|
I thought it might be good to repost this with some changes... Okay a little smaller... Only a 4 byte header... |0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|0|1...3|4|5|6|7| ---...--- | 0xF | VER | TOADDR | PORT| FRADDR | PORT| PAYLOADLEN | ---...--- / PAYLOAD / ---...--- / (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
(...) I am not in position right now, time-wise, to contribute to the LNP, but I am very interested, and may have time to contribute soon. In the mean time, I'd like to keep up with the project. I don't know if you realize, Jacob, but if you prefer (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
