| |
"Jacob S. Barrett" wrote:
>
> Those are some really good points, but I am still concerned about the
> complexity and overhead of implementing IPC on the lego. Since resources
> are so limited it might just be easier to use shared memory and semaphores
> to communicate. On the other hand we could have a network protocol stack
> and an IPC stack. Since they really don't have any real need to be
> together. That would leave the LNP stack with all its ports free for
> network communication, then those who need IPC could compile in IPC.
Indeed. I just figured that since the infrastructure would already be
there for networking, it would be elegant to use the same for IPC. As
you said, they don't actually need to be integrated. Then, there is
your point about compiling in LNP or IPC without the other.
> Lets keep it going... Comment time...
Indeed. It feels like it is just you and me in here.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: LNP Repost
|
| Those are some really good points, but I am still concerned about the complexity and overhead of implementing IPC on the lego. Since resources are so limited it might just be easier to use shared memory and semaphores to communicate. On the other (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
