|
 | | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 6:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: Ir transmission (...) To answer the question, I would say do it as core (quicker download). I think we agree (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|  
ir
(score: 1.635)
|
|
| | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of John Cooper Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 6:07 AM To: lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com Subject: Re: Ir transmission (...) I can't get EMIT to work, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.635)
|
|
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| (...) Hmm.. with a little hacking you could certainly detect logic errors. The main problem I think would be writing alternative C-Functions for the H8 assembler, which makes up legOS itself. You'd also need to create a simulator engine for legOS to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.635)
|
|
| | FW: Ir transmission
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Saturday, April 17, 1999 9:27 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: Ir transmission (...) Right you are John. I've got that code too. My only question is do we want it as (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.635)
|
|
| | tm-and-ir.c
|
| Is anyone else having problems with this? The receive and display part works fine but it won't send "Hello World" when I press the View button. The srec from the LegOS home page works fine but if I build it myself it doesn't. I've tried both the web (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.635)
|
|
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| (...) given (...) lego (...) [ stuff about lego/native collisions ] (...) of a (...) on (...) I was wondering, since people are considering using tags in the LNP frame to signify local to local messages, could we not also use this to "label" non (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.635)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.634)
|
|
| | Rotation sensor help (some progress)
|
| Again about my problems with legOS and the rotation sensor. First of all I checked the four values returned by both my two rotation sensor. They are different from the ones inside direct-sensor.c but anyway inside the specified range legOS: (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
range
(score: 1.633)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.633)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.633)
|
|
| |
|
range
(score: 1.633)
|
|
| | Floating point emulation
|
| I succeeded in using (emulated) floats in a legOS program. Here are some instructions in case some of you want/need to try 32 bit FP emulation. First of all I must point out that I have no merit at all in having got this result, a part from having (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.633)
|
|
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
| Here it is, it is working, but is waiting for IR_MODE_HI, STOP and a non-blocking EMIT. There is a light sensor on the centre connector pad. .dp displays proximity in the LCD as DEFCON.RawLight alternating with the average ambient raw light sensor (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.632)
|
|
| | Blocking IR
|
| Before I start trying to do this, does anyone know why the LegOS function write_ir is a blocking function? I'm trying to write an IR detection system but am unable to do so in LegOS because every time I write a byte to the IR port the RCX locks up. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.632)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
| Lou, thank you for your reply. (...) This should work. (...) This seems wrong to me because sets all the STATE_n_VALUE to k-RANGE_SIZE. For now I modified ds_rotation_handler() in this way (two occurrences): // if ( IN_RANGE ( STATE_0_VALUE ) ) { // (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
range
(score: 1.632)
|
|
| | FW: multitasker
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 2:31 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: multitasker (...) Excellent news. (...) You can have our SpeedBot as a demo program (as soon as I get it to (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.632)
|
|
| | Re: Multitasker test script
|
| Perhaps I should not have stripped all the comments for speed :) \ The rationale for the delay above and the delay after the IR flash is \ that the message is 77 bits of 417 microseconds each, a total \ transmission time of 32 milliseconds, the (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.632)
|
|
| | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 5:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) SENSOR_READ has changed, I think the sense of the result is different 4000 POWER_GET returns (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.632)
|
|
| | FW: New pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) Well, I'm not in a position that I really need MARKER with the multitasking testing, just a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.631)
|
|
| | FW: pbFORTH
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 9:20 AM To: robots@jpsc.co.uk Subject: RE: pbFORTH (...) Not yet. I've GOT to get MARKET going and then implement my changes for compacting the (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 1.631)
|
