|
 | | Re: legOS on Mac OS X
|
| ROSCO, I realise that would indeed be helpful! Didn't want a long and boring first post however... I've basically having a problem bulding gcc as a cross compiler. I started with the legOS HOWTO pages at (URL) . There it suggests using (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|  
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| (...) I'm currently updating/modifying/developing RcxCC and plan on doing so for a very long time to come. If you haven't tried my revised version you should definitely do so. (URL) in the middle of some major revisions that I think will be of (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
| (...) OK. I was wrong. I should have better analyzed your code... This definitively prove how long still is my way to get my hands on C :) BTW, I wrote an e-mail to Markus but got it bounced back. Mario (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: signals / legOS internals
|
| (...) Reading this again, I should mention that pushing things on the stack asynchronously is fine, as long as the stack pointer is always in the right place, which is why it must always always always point to the location I mentioned (and seemingly (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: Firmdl3 updated
|
| (...) My legOS.srec file, which is compiled with all the default settings, is exactly 21000 bytes long. The calculated size is 8144. Which is sort of in the ballpark of half the file size (if we use a very big ballpark). The proper estimate is (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Joystick function in RCXCC
|
| Is it possible to device a task that will keep a motor running for as long as a joystick button is pressed? Or do I have to write a prog. for my computer instead of one for the CM? I guess it would be possible using the spirit.ocx (a directx control (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Thread class
|
| // Thread Class for Legos // By Pongsak Suvanpong // psksvp@ccs.neu.edu // use it anyway you'd like as long as this comment is here #ifndef __THREAD_CLASS___ #define __THREAD_CLASS___ #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/dsensor.h> #include (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | One Way/No Way wires
|
| Use of diodes to MUX two motors on a single output has been known for a long time. I have not seen a description of just putting the diode in the wire itself to make a One Way wire. If you use two you get a No-Way wire which does not sound useful. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: Communication between NQC and VisualBasic
|
| (...) Unfortunately, Spirit.ocx doesn't support sending messages. However, the packet protocol is pretty simple so as long as you can access the serial port directly you should be able to build message packets. See the following web pages for more (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: LNP-problem...
|
| (...) Hi, I'm Pieter and working with Tom on a project. I 've tried you're code but it doesn't work. To me the problem seems to be with lnpd. Here is it's log of the session. 0:Info > created lock file /var/lock/LCK..ttyS0 233:Info > running in (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: How did you made nqc?
|
| (...) I started to compose a reply, but it wandered a bit off-topic and was getting quite long. I posted the resulting text here: (URL) this the sort of thing you were looking for, or perhaps more in-depth explanation of some of the algorithms used, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Port 5 Bit 2
|
| Hi, While delving into the nitty gritty details of the RCX's power off routine, which was discussed a *long* time ago in these threads: (URL) the very low message numbers... :) I noticed that in addition to putting the RAM into low power mode, port (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jun-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Re: the LEGO CNC-Machine
|
| ok, now i understand what you mean. the problem is that this setup could be difficult for long axes, i guess the axle with the worm gears would flex too much... (...) exactly what i was thinking. that's the way the machines i've seen change their (...) (17 years ago, 31-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Is there a NQC HowTo out there someplace?
|
| Hello, I have reached the limits of what Mindstorm 2.0 software can do a long time ago and now want to go further. I think I would try the NQC. My problem is that I do not know anything about C or NQC. I have learned Pascal and Basic language (and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
|
| | Swan scheduling bug?
|
| I'm starting to use the swan firmware and I'm having a problem with the scheduling. It seems like a task with a long wait does not yield properly to other tasks. Here the NQC code sample: task taska() { WaitMS(150); AddToDatalog(9900); } task main() (...) (19 years ago, 22-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 1.402)
|
