Results 1861 – 1880 of 2193.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
| (...) Scout support still has a long way to go in many ways, imho. A lot works but I still haven't implemented correct scout support in several of the dialogs. I've tried the command line option for Scout (/RCX=2) and it definitely works on my (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|  
long
(score: 0.286)
|
|
| | RE: Save image word for pbForth.
|
| (...) Sergey, This is an EXCELLENT idea. On an old project I used to work on, I actually used an SREC dump routine, but here the tower would cause problems because the PC would keep having to poll for addresses. Using XMODEM transfer will work great (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.286)
|
|
| | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| (...) I'm currently updating/modifying/developing RcxCC and plan on doing so for a very long time to come. If you haven't tried my revised version you should definitely do so. (URL) in the middle of some major revisions that I think will be of (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.285)
|
|
| | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| I haven't tried Visual NQC, neither have I tried the new version of RCXcc of John Hansen. I'm still using the old Mark Overmars RCXcc and I'm quiet happy with it. The reason for not trying al those new ones is the long term expectations. Neither of (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.285)
|
|
| |
|
range
(score: 0.284)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.284)
|
|
| | RE: H8/300 Assembler/C interface
|
| (...) Sorry, looks like I need sleep too! (...) Hmm, looks like r2 is a copy of the high byte of the second long, but the complete long is pushed onto the stack! So the thing about GCC NOT splitting is true, it just keeps a copy of the higher order (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.284)
|
|
| | Re: H8/300 Assembler/C interface
|
| (...) Not my GCC: 00000016 <_main>: 16: 6d f6 mov.w r6,@-e7 <-- save frame pointer 18: 0d 76 mov.w r7,r6 <-- new frame pointer 1a: 6b 00 00 00 mov.w @0x0:16,r0 <-- r0r1 is 1st long param 1e: 6b 01 00 00 mov.w @0x0:16,r1 22: 6b 02 00 00 mov.w (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.284)
|
|
| | RE: H8/300 Assembler/C interface
|
| (...) Not to be too obtuse, but your first message says that long and float are never split across r2 and stack. So you're saying that they ARE split? That's fine, because it makes things a lot easier - not that any of my functions actually need to (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.283)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 0.283)
|
|
| | RE: H8/300 Assembler/C interface
|
| (...) I've just done some more browsing and found this tidbit: (URL) It seems to indicate that tghe registers are always filled and that a long may be split across r2 and the stack. Comments? Cheers, Ralph (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.283)
|
|
| | Re: fast firmware downloader
|
| (...) Erm, hrm, well... the reason I didn't ship it yet is that it won't compile with any released version of legOS. In order to gain full configurability, I had to set up a seperate directory structure, with its own include tree and stripped down (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.282)
|
|
| | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
| (...) Okay, another round of fixes/modifications. Sorry I'm making these changes so fast. I am *really* interested in hearing from anyone who is trying out my revised RcxCC, by the way. :-) Anyway, this version (available from the link above) (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.282)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.282)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.282)
|
|
| | RoboLab prg size limit?
|
| I'm using robolab 1.5 for a school project, and i'm encountering some difficulty. I think i'm a pretty profiencent programmer if i think abotu it long enough, but right now i'm baffeled. I'm pretty sure the program is crashing in the RCX, so maybe (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.282)
|
|
| | Re: Listening to IR via NQC
|
| (...) Cool, that'd be great. What I'm looking for is: nqc -listen and then all IR messages sent by the RCX via SendMessage would get dumped, one per line, in decimal, to stdout. Additional parameters could make the format be comma-delimited, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.282)
|
|
| | Re: Decoding the LEGO IR remote control
|
| (...) [snip] Thanks to all you have responded to my plea for help on this list and on others ... especially Dave Baum, Kekoa Proudfoot, Dennis Clark, and several others. But, I'm giving up ... can't seem to find a way to decode the remote's signals. (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.281)
|
|
| | Re: Listening to IR via NQC
|
| (...) Yes, that is what I'm looking for. Unless anyone else knows of anything, I guess it's time to dive into the coding. :) (...) Yeah, that would work great. Does anyone have code that does this? (Don't want to reinvent the wheel...) I know of (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.281)
|
|
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
| (...) Hi Dean, meanwhile I followed your suggestions and implemented a scheme that uses a pulse scheme like this: ______ ______ ______ __ ______ ______ ___...___ Start Bit3 Bit2 Bit1 Bit0 A bit value of 1 results in a long pulse, a bit value of 0 in (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.281)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
