 | | RE: Ideas for NQC
|
|
(...) I could not agree more with Kevin. Adding a feature, such as adding in more intricate math functions, or add in tcp/ip socket support, etc. is more fruitful than making the language syntax more like others just because someone is not used to (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Ideas for NQC
|
|
(...) I object to this proposed change. Lack of knowledge of a language's syntax does not justify changing the syntax. (...) [SNIP] Kevin (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Voltage>10V????
|
|
Hi, (...) maybe your RCX is broken? What value do you get, >28000? Jürgen (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Change the the parity setting of the IR tower.
|
|
Hi, (...) that depends on which tower you are talking about: - For the serial tower just do it. - For the USB tower it seems you can't, as there is no documented function to do that. Jürgen (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Ideas for NQC
|
|
(...) Well, it won't be easy. It doesn't help that I've been working long hours at my day job either. But I'll do my best. (...) [...] (...) In C & C++ it is not optional to use a semi-colon at the end of a line. The same goes for Java, C#, and (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: USB tower/Linux/Firmdl not working nicely together
|
|
(...) I have a working USB-tower in linux 2.4.21 using the cvs legousbdriver and nqc2.5r3. I use nqc for brickos installation 2.5.09 and dll included for lx uploads. I think I patched the brickos source with a usb patch from either (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Ideas for NQC
|
|
(...) ...a bit like NQP (Not Quite Pascal) :D ? (...) That would have to be called NQB (Not Quite BASIC) ;) Ok, now, seriously, this could be usefull for lazzy typists like me, but remember that C is case sensitive, so, how could BricxCC decide (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Voltage>10V????
|
|
Hi and thanks to all that answered my questions. I'm using the method 'getVoltageMilliVolt()' in my robot. But i don't understand the value that i get, more than 10000 mV, why? if 9600mV is the total voltage that batteries provide. Bye and thanks (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Change the the parity setting of the IR tower.
|
|
Can I change the parity setting of ther IR tower so that I can use 8 data bit, no parity, 1 stopbit instead of 8 databit, odd parity, 1 stopbit. I want to access the IR tower with a serial port that has only the settings 8N1. (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Ideas for NQC
|
|
Hi John, Now that Dave Baum has given you the control under NQC, how will you manage to work both on NQC and on BricxCC??? I recomend the following changes: For NQC, something that you can add is optional use of semi-colon. It's a pain when I do a (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: NEW LEGO USB Driver
|
|
(...) Someone who's name I forget (you know who you are!) said definitely that hyperthreading cannot be simply disabled in BIOS - that Windows has to be reinstalled with a non-hyperthreading kernel. And to answer your musings in the first (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | RE: NEW LEGO USB Driver
|
|
As Mike pointed out, it is a hyper-threading problem. The reason for winXP not working, but W2K works, may very well be that W2K does not support hyperthreading feature, but WinXP does. I wonder if Mike or anyone does indeed disable the (...) (21 years ago, 8-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS USB Support (for RCX 2.0)
|
|
Could you please send me all your files? (21 years ago, 8-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: USB tower/Linux/Firmdl not working nicely together
|
|
(...) Sounds promising. I can do some testing for you is you want. Is the code where you are working on available via CVS, perhaps I can do some coding too. Cheers Bart (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: USB tower/Linux/Firmdl not working nicely together
|
|
Definitely interested in helping you test when it's working. Regards, Mark. (...) ---...--- The real purpose of books is to trap the mind into doing its own thinking. -- Christopher Morley Mark Syms <mark@marksyms.demon.co.uk> (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: USB tower/Linux/Firmdl not working nicely together
|
|
Bart, (...) The problem is that USB tower on linux is not supported by firmdl3/dll at the moment. I'm working on that capability now. If I can, my intent is to have it work for 2.4 (user added driver) and 2.6 (built-in driver) kernels. The USB tower (...) (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: [long] Interrupt programming, buggy code
|
|
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:54:47 GMT "Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote: Hi Mark, (...) [snip] (...) [snip] And that was it, indeed! Many to you, as well as Ralph and Kevin who tried to help me. There shouldn't be much trouble for me I think (if we (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: [long] Interrupt programming, buggy code
|
|
(...) Eh... Never mind this bit. I just had a gander at Kekoa's rcxlib and he already handles this correctly in debug_value(). Should've known! :-) Mark (21 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: [long] Interrupt programming, buggy code
|
|
Much better and more accurate answer from Mark - who knows a lot more about GCC that I do :-) I should stick to commenting on assembly language stuff. Ralph (...) <snippage> (21 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: [long] Interrupt programming, buggy code
|
|
Hi Benjamin, When you declare your ISR as an interrupt_handler, GCC terminates the function with an "rte" instead of an "rts". The ROM code that dispatches the interrupt to your function is already doing the rte so your function should not. Here's (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
