 | | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
oh, so that's why I got a "bad" zip this time :) ok, no problem, I'll keep using the 1st release (V.3.2) BTW, I'm now using a .bat that looks something like this: @echo off start /w RCX2.reg start rcxcc.exe start /w Cybermaster.reg start rcxcc.exe (...) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Okay, I've fixed the zip. Download the latest revision to rcxcc at: (URL) Hansen (23 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) The best laid plans of mice and men... My computer died while I was uploading to AOL so the ZIP that is there right now is corrupted. I'll try to remedy the situation as quickly as possible. John Hansen (23 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) I'll email you what I have. I have not enabled Scout support completely in that I have not touched the "fancy" features of RcxCC that let you watch the brick, etc... Some of them may work. Others may not. What I have enabled is the compile, (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Hi, (...) I don't think so. For my version of RcxCC Scout support, I dumped Scount memory map on various conditions.(Thanks to NQC -raw option!!) I will report the inside of Scout sometime. Scout is similar to Cybermaster as John stated, but I think (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | compiling C++ source under linux
|
|
Hi it's the 1st time I ask for your help. I have an urgent problem: i'm preparing a little software in C++ with legOS for linux for an university exam: I cannot 'make' C++ libraries nor main file: in the Makefile.common file there's a macro that (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | compiling C++ source under linux
|
|
Hi it's the 1st time I ask your help. I have an urgent problem: i'm preparing a little software in C++ with legOS for linux for an university exam: I make C++ libraries nor main file: in the Makefile.common file there's a macro that invoke (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Ah :) That would be great ! It's very usefull for "debuging" Thxs, :) mc. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Very interresting pages about works around the RCX
|
|
Hi, Just have a closer look : (URL) smart robots, homebrew sensors & actuators, projects,... Very good work made by them. - Christophe - (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | c++, sensor declaration
|
|
Hallo! I tried to declare sensors global, out of main(): Motor motor(Motor::B); LightSensor s(LightSensor::S3,false); int main(){ ... } make reports an error: /home/micha/legOS/util/makelx test.ds1 test.ds2 test.lx test.ds1: address out of bounds on (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: c++, classes
|
|
Hallo Frank, yes, it helped, thanks. But I still don't understand the background. Normally, in c++ you can initialize your private components in the body of the constructor or with a initialization list, like in your suggestion. Reagards. Michael (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
John, Yes please mail me your source code so I can add scout support to my program. In the beta version I added syntax highlighting the same way as in RCXCC only programmed in VB. The final version uses a complete new editor with support everything (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Serial talking between RCX and pc
|
|
Hi! Does anyone know how to make a pc and a RCX talk to each other? I've seen some examples of basic communication like downloading programs or 'turn on motor A'. But I've not seen a protocol, i.e. sending down data that is to be processed by the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Yeah, that went away as soon as I started using the RCX 2.0 locals for variable allocation - the symbolic information just didn't survive the rework. And I completely forgot to put it back in. I'm working on enhancing the listing a bit. I'll (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC, Join Forces !
|
|
(...) That's a very good idea, JOIN FORCES (1+1>2) , divide the work and release your source codes, and make RCXcc alomost as popular as LINUX. Maybe sometimes in the future, when I've more time available, I'll join you. (...) Stef Mientki (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: another sensor multiplexer
|
|
thanks for the compliments Michael, but I see it more as an evolution , I used a lot of ideas of others (including yours), so you must have created one her "grand parents". Let's all continue to exchange and combine the ideas, to create new (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RoboLab prg size limit?
|
|
Do you have a url of an image of your program? or a url where someone could download it? I think the limit is around 1500 icons. (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) Adding Scout support, if you are relying on Spirit.ocx, is essentially the same as providing Cybermaster support. It was very simple for me to add Scout support to RcxCC. I'll email you my revised RcxCC source code if you'd like. I am not a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
I've tested your RcxCC version, and it works great with RCX2 (AFAIK). (ah, and still works simultaneously with CyberMaster too, eheh) That reminds me, one very useful thing for people working with various pBricks simultaneously (like myself), would (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
Hi, I'm Ronald Strijbosch from the Netherlands and I have made a brent new program based om RCXCC, called Visual NQC 2001. The program is still in beta but the final version will be released soon. I think this program is verry interesting for you so (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
