 | | Re: A humble contribution to the community
|
|
(...) now I can just go straight to your page! Together with the Windows version by Rossz Vámos-Wentworth at (URL) (I still haven't got around to trying this Rossz), we can install easily on both platforms! (...) Aren't they always 8?) ROSCO (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | A humble contribution to the community
|
|
Having installed legOS on a couple of machines and always having trouble remembering the most basic of command i have made this page (URL) that i (and whoever else might need some help) can easily do it again. Considered that we might be having some (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Beta testers wanted
|
|
Some of you already downloaded NQCEdit, but we have only got two people to report bugs. Thank to Mario Ferrari and Marc Buchner for the suggestions they reported. For futher development we need some input about whats missing, bugs and so on. So if (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: To all sensor developers, why use voltage drive ?
|
|
Stef Mientki <s.mientki@ids.kun.nl> wrote in message news:3AA0BF7B.46088E....kun.nl... (...) AD-converter is measuring voltage, but we're not dealing with the AD-converter alone, but with a combination of the AD-converter, the pull up resistor, the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: To all sensor developers, why use voltage drive ?
|
|
hi Michael, thanks for you reaction. (...) So here I disagree with you , you are correct if you'r saying the inside AD-converter is measuring voltage, but we're not dealing with the AD-converter alone, but with a combination of the AD-converter, the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Visual NQC 2001 Beta 3 release
|
|
Hello Ronald, Great that you took up the challenge to provide a successor to RxCC! I have a problem with using the program though. I've downloaded the english version last wednesday and it still gives the runtime error and help problems you describe (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: To all sensor developers, why use voltage drive ?
|
|
Stef Mientki <s.mientki@ids.kun.nl> wrote in message news:3AA01C30.6FFBA7....kun.nl... (...) sensor-cirquit, while the RCX sense input is in fact a current sensing input ? What the RCX measures is voltage. It has a 10k pull up to 5V, but it (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: To all sensor developers, why use voltage drive ?
|
|
no, but you can consider it as a "blackbox" and measure it's behaviour by Ohm's law. (...) Stef Mientki (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: To all sensor developers, why use voltage drive ?
|
|
(...) Do you actually have a schematic of the RCX? Matthias Jetleb VA3-MWJ (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | To all sensor developers, why use voltage drive ?
|
|
Hi, Why is everyone using a voltage driven cirquit when devolping a RCX sensor-cirquit, while the RCX sense input is in fact a current sensing input ? Ok, I admit, until short I also copied the schematic everyone is using. But I now think the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Sharps at one Input
|
|
Stef Mientki <s.mientki@ids.kun.nl> wrote in message news:3A9F8C46.1B4C03....kun.nl... (...) purposes", based on (...) by which you can (...) reading some RCX (...) design and test (...) I'll plan to improve (...) values) You can just hook pots and (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
And for all of you who tried the adress ericsson.just.nu (witch IS stated in the program) I'll just say: My brother can't spell his own lastname. the correct adress is (URL) the mirror site (URL) Eriksson (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQCEdit
|
|
"Mario Ferrari" <mario.ferrari@edis.it> wrote in message news:G9J3IL.2w5@lugnet.com... (...) anywhere (...) RcxCC, (...) at (...) To reply to the group what I wrote to Mario private: (...) /Martin Eriksson And for all of you who tried the adress (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Sharps at one Input
|
|
Hi Rainer, Very nice job ! You inspired me to build a kind of "general remote control box for test purposes", based on the time-multiplexed switch encoder. The (rough and wild) idea is to make a box with 3 potmeters, 4 switches, by which you can (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: almost made it, but need help..again :)
|
|
(...) Your problem is not the .so file (hasn't got to linking stage yet), but the .h file. You need to do: gcc -I/path/of/lnplib/includes name.c -o name or put the full path to lnplib.h in the include statement in name.c HTH ROSCO (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | almost made it, but need help..again :)
|
|
heh guys, im back..again :) have downloaded and installed lnpd. i have: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_...lnp/liblnp so that my PC programs in ~/legOS/host/lnpd+li...plications can find the liblnp.so.x file. but i allways get an error when i try to gcc (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: kernel hacking in lnp.c (problem)
|
|
(...) The best way to do this kind of thing is to save the info you want to display in a variable or something, set a flag saying somethings there, and let another task display the data & reset the flag. You can see a simple implementation of this (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: kernel hacking in lnp.c (problem)
|
|
(...) Posting your code would help a lot :-). lnp_receive_packet() is called after the integrity layer has verified the checksum from an interrupt handler. So your code should be short e never call functions that wait or may cause a task switch. dll (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LVI on SourceForge
|
|
I think Andy tried to include the URL and LUGNET dropped it. Anyhow, here is the project at Sourceforge: (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Garbage Collection
|
|
Hi Chris, Hemorrhage you will. Instead of creating new objects in a loop, reuse existing objects. (This is a good move anyhow to improve the performance of your application.) You may have to change some of your own APIs to accomplish this, but it (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
