 | | RE: RCX Tower Internals
|
|
Kekoa wrote... (...) This might be a really simpleminded circuit. As far as I can tell there are a pair of 132's (simple HC logic chips) - one for each direction. They implement direct echo back, which implies that the channel is really only half (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Blocking IR
|
|
Before I start trying to do this, does anyone know why the LegOS function write_ir is a blocking function? I'm trying to write an IR detection system but am unable to do so in LegOS because every time I write a byte to the IR port the RCX locks up. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: arbitrary motor allocation
|
|
(...) Why does the code need a case statement? What interface are you looking for? void motor_dir(motor, dir) and motor_speed(motor, speed)? I missed the previous discussion. This is easy to implement, with no major changes to the code, just an (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | arbitrary motor allocation
|
|
If I recall correctly, there was some discussion of a rewrite of the OS's motor code so that arbitrary motors could be assigned by the code without the need for a large case statement in user code. Has that happened? Is it happening? Can I help? (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Tower Internals
|
|
Kekoa Proudfoot <kekoa@pixel.Stanford.EDU> wrote in message news:FCzorK.Gyn@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) and compare to see if they look similarly. For me at least, the emitters (...) By the way.. Kekoa, I've looked at your page.. And I've discovered (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Tower Internals
|
|
(...) Mine is like this too, I think. See (URL) compare to see if they look similarly. For me at least, the emitters and detector are slightly above the "clear" section. (...) For me at least, there is no way the components can line up with the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RCX Tower Internals
|
|
Hi All. I've just had some wierdness with my tower and decided to open it up to see what's inside. My basic issue is that the two emitters and the detector are not lined up (even close) with the "Clear" lens section on the front of the tower. Is (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) I'll back you up on this. My pbFORTH sends a simple character stream and it seems to work fine. No complements are necessary. I sure would like to be able to keep the RCX tower alive, though. I wonder if it's the character going through that (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | tm-and-ir (again)
|
|
Hi all, I've been using Legos without any major problems but never got the tm-and-ir demo to work properly. I can receive characters on the RCX fine but when the 'view' button is pressed (within 3 seconds) the results are normally junk on the screen (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) So of course I was curious about getting rid of the complements. Apparently, they are not necessary, or so my testing so far seems to indicate. Under the several lighting conditions I tried, and for distances of up to 27' (the farthest I could (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
