Subject:
|
Re: arbitrary motor allocation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Jun 1999 02:02:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3190 times
|
| |
|
|
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote:
> If I recall correctly, there was some discussion of a rewrite of the OS's
> motor code so that arbitrary motors could be assigned by the code without
> the need for a large case statement in user code. Has that happened? Is
> it happening? Can I help? I've finally run into a situation where it
> would be useful to me- thus the interest. (I also have lots of time to
> work on it, if anyone has anything vaguely useful for me to start from.)
> Let me know what the situation is-
> Luis
Why does the code need a case statement? What interface are you looking
for? void motor_dir(motor, dir) and motor_speed(motor, speed)? I missed
the previous discussion. This is easy to implement, with no major changes
to the code, just an addition to the header file. Probably you meant
something else.
-Kekoa
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | arbitrary motor allocation
|
| If I recall correctly, there was some discussion of a rewrite of the OS's motor code so that arbitrary motors could be assigned by the code without the need for a large case statement in user code. Has that happened? Is it happening? Can I help? (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
