 | | Python extension for lnp - take 2
|
|
I'd like to announce a Python extension for lnp. This runs on Linux and lets you use the python scripting language to communicate with a legOS application. See (URL) for more details. If you don't know what python is, look here: (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Python extension for lnp
|
|
I'd like to announce a Python extension for lnp. This runs on Linux and lets you use the python scripting language to communicate with a legOS application. See (URL) for more details. If you don't know what python is, look here: (URL) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | problems to compile legOS under Win98
|
|
Hi I hope you can and want help me. I get the windows intruction from (URL) for LegOS-0.2.2 but not winlegos.exe I do all thinks in this instruction but if i compile the LEGOS for the first time i have 2 erros. 3.o floatsisf.o cmpsf2.o fixsfsi.o (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Tower - Laptop Comms
|
|
(...) I've been wondering what would happen if you 'NULL'Modem'd Two IR Towers together. Would you get a repeater tower for jumping rooms? Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows communication to the RCX
|
|
Hi Manuel, (...) Very good! (...) Are you talking about source code? I would be *very* interested in something like that! ;) Thanks in advance, Antonio Ianiero (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Religious wars
|
|
At 19:55 01/04/00 +0000, you wrote: >I need to pick a Linux editor for legOS programming. emacs and vi suck big >time. Anyone have a recommendation? It can not be X windows based as I >have not been able to get my video card configured correctly. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | IR Tower - Laptop Comms
|
|
Maybe not exactly Lego, but..... Has anyone any thoughts about using the IR Tower to communicate with a Laptop's built in IR transceiver? Maybe set it up using Direct Cable Connection?? If I should ask this elsewhere, please put me straight :) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP problems detected
|
|
Who is maintaining the LNP code right now? Not the stuff in the kernel, but the desktop tools? It'd be great if we could wrap that up into a package and put the source into CVS. That way, it might be easier for someone like Manuel to hack in the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab 2.0
|
|
To my knowledge this is the only Robolab site where anyone participates in any discussions about Robolab. If someone knows of another site of this kind, please post a reply. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab 2.0
|
|
I had the same problem with a single-user copy ordered in the UK. The Dacta catalogue had the wrong part number in it for RoboLab 2.0. It said it was part # 2000050, but it should have been 2000051. I called the supplier and they sent version 2.0 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab 2.0
|
|
Agghh.. Our school just ordered RoboLab (site license) from Pittsco, received it April 2nd, and IT'S ONLY 1.5 !!!!! What did we do wrong?? Can we upgrade / exchange this?? Exactly what do we need to order to get 2.0?? I was depending on the 2.0 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | LNP problems detected
|
|
A problem appeared when trying to sent the value 16. The LNP protocal makes the folowing string F0011000 I couldnt receive in my computer the final caracter the 0. This can be a problem. Another problem, this one alowed by the protocol is the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Windows communication to the RCX
|
|
I made a Visual C++ 5.0 application to talk to the RCX. If someone his interested I can give it. My demo sample is a remote controler to a robot with differential drive. I am using WinlegOS and I would like to contribut with this application to new (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | P-brick Script code terminology
|
|
Hi all, Perhaps someone can clarify this for me... I've been looking at the LEGO P-brick Script code language documentation that comes with the RIS 2.0 SDK PreAlpha. I was initially confused by the numerous references to program stacks. Does 'stack' (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem building bugbot3.nqc in cybermaster
|
|
(...) Just delete the SetSensor() lines. CyberMaster only supports touch sensors, so the entire sensor configuration thing isn't needed...in fact CyberMaster doesn't support some of those bytecodes (which is why many of the constants and functions (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: controling two motors with only one output?
|
|
Indeed, your circuitry is interesting (I'm not sure though it would save time, since soldering can be pretty tedious...). But the challenge here is to make it out of Lego. (and not destroy one piece, by the way...). Denis. (...) Denis Cousineau, (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | gcc 2.95.2 8?(
|
|
First, I must apologise for posting the wrong URL to my update. It's actually at (URL) 8?/ OK. I bit the bullet & installed egcs 1.1.2 as well. I've confirmed two things: 1. My memcpy/memset update doesn't break under egcs, and 2. gcc 2.95.2 causes (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | problem building bugbot3.nqc in cybermaster
|
|
When I try to compila bugbot3.nqc (the code of the Dave's wonderfull book) using my cybermaster as target, the compiler return twice the following error: SENSOR_TOUCH not defined I used the command line nqc -TCM bugbot3.nqc with NQC 2.3 thanks in (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Checksum download of text to RCX
|
|
(...) would (...) Can do... Currently a line is transmitted as <text>NL<checksum>, so a checksummed line can already be distinguished from a non-checksummed, CR-terminated line. Adding a line header (any objections against STX?) is more failsafe, of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: sending output to LCD possible?
|
|
(...) Not possible with the existing RCX firmware. However the RCX 2.0 firmware (currently in early-alpha) does support displaying a variable (and almost anything else) on the LCD. These operations will be available in NQC...but only when targetting (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
