 | | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
(...) OK - dim it shall be. (...) Oh yeah...I forgot about that feature. It's in the backup folder of my account folder. (...) Cool! I'm not sure it will be better, though. (...) Thanks, Robert! Ed (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
(...) Robert, Well, so far I've only matched your efforts, and I'm unable to improve upon them. I definitely see how flakey the training procedure may be interpreted by the OmniRemote. It appears that the protocol from the RCX transmitter tower is (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
snip... (...) I don't have OmniRemote but this may help. The normal RCX commands are not consistent. When you send the same command repeatedly, the command is slightly different on alternate commands. In other words the first time it sends "A" then (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
(...) That's good advice. I forgot to mention to Ed that having the RCX on will confuse OmniRemote because of the return IR from the RCX. The problem I have found with using the LEGO remote commands to train OmniRemote is the final d2 command (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
I'm not 100% positive, but I don't think you need the button release command if you are just using motor control commands. Mike Robert Eddings <webmake@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:38513125.D77D9B...uth.net... (...) command (...) "B" (...) (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Mike, Robert - Thanks for your wealth of insight on this. I'm starting to come up to speed, I think. So, the RCX is acknowledging the IR tower command string, based on receipt of a EOS of some sort, perhaps, and OmniRemote can't process that ACK? (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Ed, yes the RCX is acknowledging most commands. It does not do this with the commands used in LRemote ((URL) -- I'm stuck on the old name too, for the same reason). The motor commands used in LRemote are repeating commands. As long as you hold down (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Ed, LEGO does not use IrDA protocol but this is not the problem with OmniRemote. OmniRemote simply records any IR it detects at training and transmits a copy of the signals no matter what format they are in. I believe the two main problems with (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
Mike, You beat my response by 3 minutes and we said basically the same thing. We've been working on the same things for so long we are starting to think alike. Scary huh?! :) Robert (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
yes. Thanks for the nice words though. By the way I've given more thought to using the built in IR. I think we need to access the hardware directly to do it though. OmniRemote accesses the hardware directly too. I'm waiting for the color version of (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
(...) OK. (...) Yes, I do. That's going to be my next step. (...) OK. Thanks for the appropriate re-direction. No sense wasting time figuring out another protocol just yet if it doesn't even come into play. (...) I'm working on a layout to publish (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
| |
| | Re: Training OmniRemote for RCX commands
|
|
(...) I see. So OmniRemote isn't generic enough to handle all codes from any IR device? I guess that would create a lot of overhead that the developer of OmniRemote doesn't need to get involved with, if they just want to remain in the context of (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
