Subject:
|
Re: 5VDC Voltage Regulation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:32:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
975 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Michael Gasperi writes:
>
> Jacob Schultz <dungeonmaster@get2net.dk> wrote in message
> news:FIrMLo.H8K@lugnet.com...
> > Normally you apply a diode to swallow this current, so that the voltage
> > cannot become higher than 0.7 volts.
>
> A "freewheeling" diode is a good idea generally, but the RCX must already
> have diodes built into the driver IC. It has to turn on and off the motor
> hundreds of times a second to generate PWM.
> http://www.melexis.com/site/10402/f_10402.htm is the driver data sheet, but
> it doesn't show the diodes.
You can't have the diodes on the motor because it goes in both directions.
If you put a diode out there, you would have a dead short in one of the
directions. Such things need to be built into the H-bridge, not the motor
leads. So, I seriously doubt that this relay circuit will need a flyback
diode, this will already be covered in the H-bridge, which was designed to
handle an inductive load (obviously). Adding a diode will simply create the
possibility of shorting the output if the reverse voltage is applied (like,
putting the connector on the other way?) I think the diode is bad idea
entirely.
DLC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 5VDC Voltage Regulation
|
| Jacob Schultz <dungeonmaster@get2net.dk> wrote in message news:FIrMLo.H8K@lugnet.com... (...) A "freewheeling" diode is a good idea generally, but the RCX must already have diodes built into the driver IC. It has to turn on and off the motor (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
