Subject:
|
RE: Would-be hacker queries.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 May 1999 22:36:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1035 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, rhempel@bmts.com (Ralph Hempel) writes:
> You are right, but recursion carries a terrible price in terms of stack
> usage. Most recursion is useful for implementing search and traversal
> algorithms, but unless the hardware supports DEEP stacks for the worst
> case, the problem is almost always better solved the iterative way...
Don't modern implementations of Lisp/Scheme/Logo automatically convert tail-
recursion into iteration?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: Would-be hacker queries.
|
| (...) Yes, as do decent implementations of traditional compiled languages. For example, GCC converts the following: int f(int v) { if(v<2) return v; return f(v-1); } into int f(int v) { while(v>1) { v--; } return v; } Not terribly useful, but (...) (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Would-be hacker queries.
|
| (...) You are right, but recursion carries a terrible price in terms of stack usage. Most recursion is useful for implementing search and traversal algorithms, but unless the hardware supports DEEP stacks for the worst case, the problem is almost (...) (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
