 | | Re: unsubscribing?
|
|
Ben, It appears you are on the crynwr list, which is maintained seperately from Lugnet. Roc appears to be directly on Lugnet. Roc - If you really have huge problems unsubscribing, post to lugnet.admin and ask Suz for help. Ben - I recommend first (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: unsubscribing?
|
|
This is very painful: impossible. I tried, had to give up, and so had to resort to automatically dump these in my junk mail. How awesome and inspiring this mail group might be for some, it has turned into a hassle for me (and now also for you I am (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: unsubscribing?
|
|
(...) First thing is that this should probably have been posted to lugnet.admin or .offtopic if at all. You need to go to the (URL) website, and then click on "newsgroups", under this, select "News by mail". You will need your email address and a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Pictures of the NXT hardware
|
|
Hi, today I opened up a new NXT from the US and made some photographs: (URL) Jürgen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.net> (URL) key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91 23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4 (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Flex system hose
|
|
(...) I had a look at the 1/8" plastic tubing in model railway shops and stalls at shows. I think it's ABS or polystyrene. I have no issues with cutting the tubes either :-) but I don't like painting stuff used as or with LEGO bricks. I think the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | unsubscribing?
|
|
sorry to post this here, but i really cant find an answer online how do i unsubscribe form the lugnet robotics list? r (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
OK. Let's start over again: What I should have said is that I believe that if you have two vehicles each weighing 2 lbs (the maximum allowed by the rules), one rolling, one "walking", the probablity of making a "stronger" forwardly mobile unit is (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
(...) I see a high amount of torque required on the Lego motors also. In general, and if done poorly, all you have is a bot with a stalled motor for one minute running at full power. Clutch gears could help, but it would have to be done in such a (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
(...) So you have (in essence) a walking robot - but you wouldn't want to halve your traction by having only half of your feet on the ground at any one time - you'd want to have a robot with LOTS of feet and pick up just some tiny fraction of them (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
I read the entire thread, and the rules and ask the question: Why must it ROLL at all? If friction is the name of the game, and if the wheels (tires) are the parts that have the "stickiest" qualities, then why not maximize the surface area of those. (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
(...) Yes, the driver IC is current-limited to about 500mA (and thermal limited too), so it is very hard to destroy! (...) I have used NiMH batteries a lot on RCX, the only adverse effect I noticed is that the power available on motors is nearly (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
(...) I have not seen them on the RCX, but I have on other devices, where power transisotrs have died. Its all to do (I think) with the characteristics under load, and the fact that larger spikes in current may occur with rechargeables. If the IC (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
Hi Danny, (...) Have you seen real failures using some rechargeables batteries? I believe that the RCX motor driver IC is really foolproof, and I don't think anything could be destroyed using various kind of batteries (provided that the 9 or 10 (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
(...) Depending on the kind of rechargeables you are using, they generally have significantly different characteristics. They also often output a slightly lower voltage (about 1.2 or 1.3v per cell as opposed to the expected 1.5). If you have a (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
(...) Thanks for your replies. Both are RCX2 and I use the Robolab software. In Administrator / RCX settings you can set the RCX IR-power setting to high or low, but both were already in high. After some testing I found out that the main problem are (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How do you create a new VI for NXT-G?
|
|
Shortly, an SDK will be made available that will allow for NXT blocks to be constructed using the same functions used to make the built-in blocks. The SDK will be made available on the NI site, probably linked from ni.com/mindstorms, and probably (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
I'm coming in a little late on this topic, but I wanted to restate things just a little. NXT programs are built using a library of blocks. These blocks are not "built-in", to the compiler, but are simply shipped and placed in the palette. Each of (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
(...) There was a good discussion a few weeks back... (URL) here's a chance to test out those theories. What is the "Right" speed??... Steve (19 years ago, 18-Jul-06, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
(...) I'm guessing one of your RCX units is a 1.0, while the other is a 1.5 (labeled 1.0, but without the power port) or 2.0? There are a very few hardware difference betwen RCX versions, but this is one of them. See: (URL) I think you can adjust (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
|
|
(...) I think you can adjust the transmit value from the software, but not the reception sensitivity as far as I know. IR sensitivity can be affected by battery performance, ambient lighting (though not likely a factor if others are responding (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
