To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 21391
21390  |  21392
Subject: 
Re: Mechanical pneumatic piston
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:59:21 GMT
Viewed: 
1626 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net> wrote:
Mike Thorn wrote:
At 11:38 AM 10/9/2003, you wrote:


Nope.  Worm gears are not an integral number of studs long.  They are about 1/4
of a stud short.  Not enough for a small pulley (1/2 bushing).

I'd be very interested to know the reason why LEGO chose to make the
worm gear
so short :-(


Yes, it seems rather odd. It really wouldn't have affected the design of
the gear at all. Just extend the spiral another fraction of an inch.
Simple, really.

If it's right that they're about 1/4 or 1/8 stud short, you ought to be
able to line up 4 of them and stick in a half bush.

The end of the helix on one worm gear lines up exactly with the start
of the helix on a second worm gear.  If the gears were a quarter stud
longer, they wouldn't have this useful property unless Lego also changed
the pitch of the helix.

However, if they did that, then either:

a) The teeth would have to be a bit wider apart - and it wouldn't mesh
    properly with other Lego gears.

b) They'd have to change the slope of the helix which would mean that
    one revolution of the worm gear wouldn't be an exact sub-multiple
    of the number of teeth on the gear it's meshing to - and it would
    be very hard to calculate nice exact gear ratios.  Also, the slope of
    the gear's helix is fairly critical to it functioning as a worm gear,
    you don't have much 'wiggle room' here.

They had to compromise on one of those properties - and the exact length
of the gear was obviously the thing they decided to give up on.

If you look at the 1x4 rack (or any of the other sizes, for that matter) you'll
see that actually there is more slop available than you'd think. The gears mesh
with them fine, The worm gear similarly could have been stretched just a tiny
bit, and it would still have worked okay.

--
  David Schilling



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Mechanical pneumatic piston
 
(...) The gear rack has an advantage in that the teeth are parallel to the pinion gear's teeth. That ain't the case for the worm gear. The pitched worm interfaced to a pinion with normal straight teeth eats up most of the slop that you normally get (...) (21 years ago, 11-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mechanical pneumatic piston
 
(...) The end of the helix on one worm gear lines up exactly with the start of the helix on a second worm gear. If the gears were a quarter stud longer, they wouldn't have this useful property unless Lego also changed the pitch of the helix. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics)

25 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR