Subject:
|
Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 03:59:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
744 times
|
| |
|
|
In my experience, rotational sensors are accurate to within +/-5%. 100% accurate sensors would
be great, but 95% accurate sensors are still very useful. You can compensate for the inaccuracy
in various ways, e.g. in the software. IMHO, this is no reason to be disappointed or not to use them.
YMMV (literally).
--
Mark Haye, mark_haye(@)tivoli(.)com
IBM TSM Server Development, Tucson, AZ
"Rebel Transcanner" <hendryjr@oxford.net> wrote in message news:G7Mzqo.1r9@lugnet.com...
> "Bob Fay" <rfay@we.mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:G7MKLo.2tB@lugnet.com...
>
> > Rotation sensors will lose counts randomly in spite of the firmware.
>
> I'll back that! It's totally hit-and-miss. I've done several tests on
> different gearings (some running the thing off a micromotor...) and no
> matter what, they *always* loose count. I'm really dissapointed with them,
> and I've hardly used them for this exact reason. :(
>
> Iain
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
| "Bob Fay" <rfay@we.mediaone.net> wrote in message news:G7MKLo.2tB@lugnet.com... (...) I'll back that! It's totally hit-and-miss. I've done several tests on different gearings (some running the thing off a micromotor...) and no matter what, they (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
