To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 11978
11977  |  11979
Subject: 
Re: Autonomous Robot
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:38:02 GMT
Viewed: 
3022 times
  
Marco C. <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote:
> At 14:56 03-08-2000 GMT, Jonathan Knudsen wrote:
> > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2000/05/22/LegoMindstorms.html
> > You can use a differential to take the difference of the two motors'
> > output; if the motors are not moving at the same speed, you'll see some
> > movement on the rotation sensor.
> 
> Great approach :) ! Using "hardware" to "calculate" the delta, instead of
> doing it by software, "wasting" a second rotation-sensor. Great :)

Yes. It *is* a great approach, if your task is to go straight. Unfortunately
it's not good for odometry, 'cause the delta alone is not enough to
calculate your position & heading.

> > My conclusion was that dead reckoning alone is not enough--you should
> > periodically calibrate with another navigation technique, like using
> > landmarks.
> 
> Yup, just like every multi sensor-enabled living beeing, using a mix of
> memorised (/learned) map or path description with real-time adjustments to
> it, by checking from time-to-time for landmarks while constantly
> (inconsiently?) adapting the way to move and avoid obstacles.
> 
> That's why I see the "Where am I and how do I get there" problem only
> solvable,  not by using simply "the best" technic, but through a *mix* of
> these and other frequently "oposite" technics.

This is definitely true. And from what I read and understand the most used
combination is artificial landmarking in the long range and odometry in the
short one.

> I'm curious to see what solutions Mauro will come up with and implement in
> the end :)

I'm curious too :-)

Ciao
Mario



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Autonomous Robot
 
(...) Great approach :) ! Using "hardware" to "calculate" the delta, instead of doing it by software, "wasting" a second rotation-sensor. Great :) (...) Yup, just like every multi sensor-enabled living beeing, using a mix of memorised (/learned) map (...) (26 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)

37 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR