 | | Useful Track and Electrical Data
|
|
Regular browsers of Brickshelf might have noticed that I added a new track plans section to my gallery: (URL) the 9V folder (URL) there are useful modules such as Curves (URL) and Double Bends (URL) , conforming to various minimum radii depending on (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.cad, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Would you like to join our project? :) We're still in planning/design mode, so additional input is always good. (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) ... (...) As it turns out, I just started on a project like that. I intentionally went out of my way to avoid using the letters N, X, & T right NeXT to each other. My totally unofficial opinion would be something like this. There's not much (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Is the RCX.NET project's name technically a trademark violation? I just started working with José David Parra on a redesign of his original namespace, so now maybe he'll have to rename it, too. :) What's LEGO's position on code namespaces, (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Steve. At least Lego made it easy for us to play around with the letters to come up with a new name, as Philo mentioned in this thread. :) - Brian (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) power) and has 64k of memory. How much runtime state can you really process with 64k after the kernel and sensor/motor processes are loaded? Maybe more than I think... Btw, thanks for the document! The current paradigm in RTOS design seems to (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: remote control and rcx
|
|
(...) hey thanks dave hopefully i can run some tests as soon as my new rcx arrives. but i'll give it a shot. i'll be posting any progress so u'll know how it goes LeE (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) I'll add it to my tool belt if it'll run on Linux ;) I certainly don't mean to slight the NXT software (I haven't even played with it yet). I assume it will be quite capable. (...) Indeed. Programming languages are simply tools. They should be (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Very good point! So one design goal/guiding principle would be try not to break brickOS programs for NXT and provide if nessecary a easy software upgrade path. (...) I would really like to point out (to the general audience) what I see as a (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) I would be in favor of having a port of BrickOS for NXT (instead of having another thing to learn). I'm not gonna throw away my RCXs and I would prefer having similar languages for both bricks. Yes programmers would need to know the nuances (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Alexander, What you are describing seems more like an end application (multiple autonomous robots that do X and Y and can communicate using Bluetooth) then an RTOS design. An analogy of your description of using the NXT processor for just the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) No, as explained Steve, that's bad... Why not the easy one: leJOS Next? Philo (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Brian, LEGO posted a very nice message on Lugnet about this a couple years ago, after a news story came out, questioning TLG's approach to such things. (URL) short, the answer will be no. I'm sure they'll be quick to put NXT right next to RCX (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot new video
|
|
(...) Hi John, hi Philo :) John thanks for your post :) I didn' t take much time to program this robot (on video you can only see random moves)...but did you know which soft I use??....BricxCC....of course!!!! regards Chris from France (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: remote control and rcx
|
|
(...) Well, as a guy who continuously puts 9 volt conenctions on the sensor ports on the RCX (LDCC--love ya lots!!!), what you have to do is separate the wires connecting the RC port and the RCX sensor port with light bricks-- (URL) down until you (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | remote control and rcx
|
|
here's a question to boggle some minds ok here's what i'm trying to do, i have the remote control module from the supersonic racer set and i'm trying to connect it to the input port of the rcx and then having it output to the motors. i dont know if (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) If the mechnisms for control are still applicable, then yeah, you could port over the code that is used to activate the various sensors. In terms of uCOS, after reading half of the kernel book and actually working with it a little bit (the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) ...snip... (...) Steve, I totally agree with you. A few remarks: 1. There doesn't exist any non-buggy programming language. 2. There doesn't exist any best language. The reason that different languages exist is that there are different people (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Hitachi processor to an 32 bit ARM7 processor, one would need to rewrite brickOS kernel for the ARM7 processor. But why reinvent the wheel when there is already several really good real-time operating systems for the ARM, including uCOS-II? I (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Version 3.3.7.10 (2005-10-05) Version 3.3.7.7 Version 3.3.7.6 (2003-10-27) Version 3.3.7.5 (2003-05-22) Version 3.3.7.4 (2003-03-24) Version 3.3.7.3 (2003-03-07) Version 3.3.7.2 (2003-02-12) Version 3.3.7.1 (2003-01-16) Version 3.3.6.6 (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
