 | | RE: Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones)
|
|
(...) Well what about an indexation based on a sensor value? How could your compiler know the range the sensor has? Sample: int volatile *color_sensor = (int *) 0x4000; int getColor(void) { static int color[4] = { 123, 456, 789, 111 }; return (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones)
|
|
(...) Well what about an indexation based on a sensor value? How could your compiler know the range the sensor has? Sample: int volatile *color_sensor = (int *) 0x4000; int getColor(void) { static int color[4] = { 123, 456, 789, 111 }; return (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I'm a software engineer, and I've written and tested code in many fields- education, games, graphics hardware, and web sites. All of these give me insight that should help me thoroughly test the suitability and functionality of both the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones)
|
|
(...) Why? Full Java requires it but you're not trying to make a full Java implementation. Why can't all your data be statically allocated by the compiler (not allocated at run-time)? Sure, you'd have to tweak the language a little but so what? (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones)
|
|
(...) I was looking into Java as a small-robot programming language and examined a few implementations. I came to the conclusion that it simply wasn't suitable. Sure you can shoehorn a cut-down version into a small processor but you've had to (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) Well, I do, but I'm sure as heck not offering her up in trade for a NXT. The NXT can't punch - my wife can. And my wife can already call me up on a cell phone anyway. (...) 1) Mac development - I'd bug test the Mac software, as well as work on (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) What would I do? I'd build robots that beat your robots, like I always do, Steve ;) K, I admit it--it happened only once.... Seriously, I'm more of a builder--I'll leave the development of various software additions and sensor builds to (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavy weight lifting
|
|
(...) Wow, 44 kg! That's 97 pounds, and a lot of weight! Impressive. (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Indeed. (...) (URL) have to register but I hear their sim is quite good and feature rich. (...) Will check that out... (...) Agreed! :-)! -aps (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Loading cargo from and to train electrically
|
|
(...) Funny how oceans apart we come up with the same ideas. I stopped using light sensors for the RCX and laterly use an isolated track to stop trains at two stations. The third ouput being used for a level crossing. I really like the loader idea, (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | RE: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) The best ARM gcc compiler/binutils package is here: (URL) - library API to access higher level NXT functionality (...) August (...) with other (...) controller (either (...) Redboot/eCOS) All of the above will require many hours of (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: studless construction practice
|
|
(...) I guess you mean (URL) ... (...) I completely agree with Brian. While I do like studless construction (I still need more time to think and build with them, but the result is more refined), I use studded beams when I need stiffness. A single (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I'd like to explore the opportunity to build sensors and actuators using the new digital interface. I would also put the new motors on the test bench to see how they perform... Philo (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I really think it was way too superficial. I would have liked to at least describe one of my projects with a few words. Anyway that would have created too much work for the people who will have to choose the blessed ones :) (...) Add a small (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT and bluetooth enabled phones
|
|
Hi Peter, (...) no, it can't be. (...) That is the top item on my list to add to Lejos, and on NXT it is possible :-) In Lejos we figured it would have eaten so much memory that there wouldn't have been much point in managing the rest. (...) Yes. On (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
Hi Steve, (...) I would make sure that it works with Linux w.r.t. USB and Bluetooth, and work on porting and extending Lejos for the NXT. Feels like waiting for Christmas again :-) Jürgen (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) In a way, the very reason that I don't think Lego would pick me is the reason I think they might. I have been involved in Lego Mindstorms for less than a month. My first set (RIS 2.0) was bought the week before Christmas. I have made a (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: How will they decide who gets to participate?
|
|
I am just curious what additional information they will need to decide who gets on the test team? I have a fair amout of Labview G-language programming skill and can modify the RCX robot commands with out too much trouble. If we get a decent kit (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) I would work really hard on updating or helping to update all the current languages and alternate firmwares which can be used to program the existing LEGO programmable bricks so that they can be used to program the NXT brick. This would (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I'd like to see how much can be done with the Bluetooth and I/O with respect to the RCX and intermixing the two sets. I'd like to add BT to current designs, and having to purchase only one NXT for that would be brilliant. (20 years ago, 17-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
